The amazing amount of the money made by Star Trek when broadcasting

The overwhelming financial success of “Star Trek” cannot be ridiculous. “Star Trek”, after all, occurs in post -capitalist Utopia where the money has become something of the past, and the desire has been greatly defeated. Resource resources is easy in the world of “Star Trek”, as it has faster revolutions than light that can bring medical supplies to patients, and the symmetry can immediately copy the creation of food, clothes for hungry and cold. Here on Earth in 2025, however, Star Trek makers rolling in a Latin, pressing gold. Every place, the famous concession through multiple broadcast platforms, has continued to generate huge amounts of revenue for Paramount, its Holding Company, over the past few years.

Influe the cover (via Parrot analyzes Broadcasting Economy platform) that “Star Trek” – from January 2020 to December 2024 – made $ 2.6 billion worldwide.

It should be noted that Paramount gets revenues, mainly, two different sources “Star Trek”. The company’s broadcast service, CBS All Access (later Paramount+) was launched in 2014, and brought a new set of subscribers in 2017 The first offer for “Star Trek: Discovery” The first “Star Trek” TV since the end of “Star Trek: Enterprise” in 2005. Paramount soon began laying all their eggs in the “Star Trek” basket, where he launched five new “Star Trek” shows in the next five years (including in That is “short trips”, “Picard”, “Lower Floor”, “Prodigy” and “Strange New Worlds”). It was a new renaissance for the privilege, and the overwhelming size of the new science fiction adventures began to match the peak Trek.

But in addition to the new subscribers that Paramount was fully attracted with their new adventures, the company is still getting revenues from the restoration of the old school. It includes $ 2.6 billion in Paramount’s profitable license fee for other broadcast services such as Netflix. Paramount+ may clash with new viewers with new trips, but many of them are still controlling the adventures of Kirk, Picard, Cisco, Janouway, Artcher.

One should remember that “Star Trek” was toxic with signs. Although Paramount has its Paramount+broadcasting service, the company was never shy of the oldest “Star Trek” to any enthusiastic retired. According to a graphic fee in the WARP report, Netflix is ​​just less than “Star Trek”, while Hulu is just less than $ 150 million. PRIME Video alone won Paramount about $ 220 million in “Star Trek” sales. The graph also shows that more and more people come to “Star Trek” all the time. Even the 38 -year -old TV series, such as “Star Trek: The Next Generation”, was keeping viewers.

“Star Trek” has become everywhere in the home video due to strange enough, defects in the Janet Jackson wardrobe in Super Bowl XXXVIII. Super Bowl has been broadcast by CBS, but the second half was produced by MTV, both of which are owned by the FIM media group. The following scandal Nipple incident 2004 He inspired many CEOs to pick up, and in the end a division inside the Viakum. Reminding: Viacum also owns Paramount, which owns “Star Trek”.

The division, in what Trekkies sees as a bureaucratic chaos, put the rights of “Star Trek” with CBS and the rights of the movie with Paramount. To generate revenues with their television programs, CBS started to version “Star Trek” on the DVD disk, and when the banners became something, “Star Trek” rented them as possible. “Star Trek” can be seen on Prime, Netflix, Hulu and any major service you want. These procedures conducted by CBS “Star Trek” have kept a lot in the eyes of the audience, calling Trekkies in ancient school and new fans to see their favorite Starfleet adventures over and over again.

As in the 1970s, Star Trek flourished in restarting. Money continued to flow.

Paramount, and at the same time, only allowed “Star Trek” movies. They responded to Fiadcom divided by the “Star Trek” license from the company’s CBS arm and made the movie “Star Trek” in 2009. Abrams to create a distance from the institution that was unclear.

In 2019, after Paramount+ was already something, CBS was already overseeing the multiple new “Star Trek” offers, Finally, it was re -disabledBring the rights of “Star Trek” again together. No films “Star Trek” have been played in theatrical since retail, but January 2025 witnessed the release of Olatunde Osunsanmi’s Action Thriller “Star Trek: Security 31” on Paramount+. The film was not terrible, but it was the appropriate movie “Star Trek”, the first since “Star Trek Beyond” in 2016. Films and TV programs are now under the same umbrella, and Paramount can make huge profits by renting “packages “From” Star Trek “to signs.

The largest broadcast packages are likely to be more attractive to its panels than those that the company had to agree to return in the nineties. In 1994, “Star Trek: The Next Generation” had ended. This was strange, because the show was still like Bonanza. According to the executive producer, Rick BermanNevertheless, it was difficult and difficult to sell the “next generation” to local TV stations, where the stations must agree to restart each episode several times. With seven full seasons of an expensive offer, fewer TV stations wanted to stick to that time. After a while, the continuation of “Nextgen” was not economical.

With the flow, though, everything is on demand, time restrictions are no longer a concern. Now, Paramount can cut many flights and sell them to hungry signs of content. And they did.

When it comes to the latest “Star Trek: Discovery” in particular – one can refer directly to Netflix for its success. Again when the series was still in photography, CBS concluded a deal with Netflix, allowing Stuner To be the exclusive distributor for the offer abroad. The deal caused 6 million dollars to $ 7 million per episode, which largely covered the expenses that are incurred to make this series. “Discovery” may be criticized by Trekkies for the old school, but CBS was comprehensive in this series, and it was released everywhere. Like restarting Star Trek in old school, the new journey shows have benefited from being everything, everywhere, simultaneously.

Netflix continued to fund “Discovery” in a similar way in its first three seasons, allowing CBS to play with the concession. With compensation for many of its expenses, “Star Trek” can remain prolific. It will not be until 2020 and reinforce Viacom, which Paramount will announce that it can deal with the international distribution itself. Thanks to Netflix, though, Paramount+ became a bigger player in broadcasting wars, so this step was barely fool. It did not harm that Paramount had made strikes with “Yellowstone” (and its separate sites) and continued to earn money from “SpongeBob SquarePants”.

To write these lines, Paramount is about to integrate with Skydance MediaThe merger is scheduled to enter on March 20, 2025. Many of the most modern “Star Trek” shows (still “strange” new worlds “still appear, and the future of the concession appears smaller than it was during the early CBS all days of arrival. Despite the financial problems of Paramount as a whole, “Star Trek” continues to continue. So do not feel bad about watching the “Deep Space Nine” episode for the fourth time. It is possible that “Star Trek” will continue.