Microsoft’s study finds that relying on artificial intelligence kills your critical thinking skills

Human artificial intelligence may make it outdated – not in the way you think. Instead of getting Amnesty International to complete the tasks to the extent that it replaces the person, we may rely on the incomplete tools that our capabilities are atrophy. A New study Researchers at Microsoft and Carnegie Mellon have found Carnegie Mellon that the more people are on artificial intelligence tools to complete their duties, the less critical thinking, which makes it difficult to call skills when needed.

The researchers took advantage of 319 knowledge factor-a person whose function includes data or information-and they were asked to do the self-report on how to use artificial intelligence tools in the workplace. Participants were asked to report the tasks they were asked to do, how they used artificial intelligence tools to complete them, and their confidence is the special ability to complete the same task without any Amnesty International assistance.

Throughout the study, a pattern revealed itself: the more confident the worker in the ability of artificial intelligence to complete the task, the more they feel that they leave their hands on the wheel. Participants reported “activating a perception of critical thinking” when they felt that they could rely on the tool of artificial intelligence, which represents the ability to depend excessive technology without examination. The study found that this was especially true for low risk tasks, as people tend to be less important. Although it is extremely human to wander your eyes on a simple mission, the researchers have warned that this could stipulate concerns about “dependent on long -term dependence and decrease in the solution of independent problems.”

In contrast, when workers had less confidence in the ability of artificial intelligence to complete the designated task, the more they find themselves participating in the skills of critical thinking. On the other hand, they usually reported more confidence in their ability to assess and improve artificial intelligence on their own.

Another note discovery of the study: Users who have been able to access the Trucophachid intelligence tools tend to produce a “less variety of results for the same task” compared to those who do not have. Which passes the sniff test. If you use the Amnesty International tool to complete the task, you will be limited to what this tool can create based on its training data. These tools are not infinite ideas machines, but only can work with what they have, so it checks that their outputs will be more homogeneous. The researchers wrote that this deficiency in various results can be explained as a “deterioration of critical thinking” of workers.

The study does not question the idea that there are situations in which artificial intelligence tools may improve efficiency, but it raises warning flags about the cost of this. By relying on artificial intelligence, workers begin to lose muscle memory that they have developed from completing some tasks on their own. They start using external sources not only the work itself, but their critical participation with it, assuming that the device has been dealt with. So, if you are concerned about replacing artificial intelligence and you are incorrectly using it for your work, it may create a self -fulfilling prophecy.