Experts appeal to the evidence used in the conviction

London – A committee of experts has opposed the medical evidence used to condemn the British nurse Lucy Litabi who killed seven newborns And the attempt to kill seven others, the doctor who led the exam said on Tuesday. Dr. Show Lee, a retired newborn doctor from Canada, said that the group of 14 doctors concluded that newborns died either for natural causes or from bad medical care.

“In short, we did not find women and gentlemen, you killing,” said to me at a press conference in London.

Letby, 35, is Presenting life sentences With no chance of issuance after it was Kill She tried to kill while working as a newborn nurse at Countess Chester Hospital in northwestern England between June 2015 and June 2016.

Defense lawyer Mark McDonald said that there is now “overwhelming evidence” that Leti is wrong.

This was the second press conference held by McDonald in part to challenge the conclusions of Dr. Dewey Evans, who was the main witness to the prosecution.

Prosecutors said that letby left a small follow when she killed children and in some cases air injection into the bloodstream or stomach, causing a blockage. But Li told me that Evans had offended his 1989 academic interpretation of the blockage.

He told me that he had collected a prominent group of international medical experts who volunteered to review the records of 17 children accused of injury or killing.

He told me that Evans diagnosed children with air blockage in the absence of another cause of death. But for me he said that the blockage is very rare and that staining the skin described in the experiment was not consistent with what was seen when there was a blockage.

He told me: “The idea that these children can be diagnosed with air blockage because they collapsed and did not have these skin panels that have no evidence in reality.”

Letby has already lost two shows to appeal. Her lawyer submitted a request on Monday to obtain a criminal case review committee to study her conviction, which may lead to another shot when resuming.

The general investigation in the cases of failure in the hospital, which prompted children to harm over and over again, is scheduled to end next month. This investigation does not examine the evidence used to condemn Letby, but it aims to hold the hospital and administration staff to consider how to treat parents.

During her trial, Public Prosecutor Nicolas Wayne Williams claimed that Lyetby had removed support for breathing one child and that the doctor did not find her and she did nothing as the child was fighting,

Williams claimed that letby then removed the breathing pipeline twice over the next few hours, “in an attempt to cover its paths and suggested that the first laying was accidental.”

Dr. Ravi Jayram, a hospital pediatrician, told the jury that there is “no evidence” that let him do anything to help the child when he entered and saw her standing next to the newborn incubator.

Letby told the jury in that case that it had not remembered any such event, and has always denied any of the crimes he was convicted.