What is the role of Democrats outside power over large technology? | Technology news

It seems that US President Donald Trump has formed an alliance with some of the most prominent technical billionaires in the country.

Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos and Google Sundar Pichai are some of the technology children civilized region Installing it. Openai Sam Altman CEO of Openai Sam Altman jumped on the cart, Be praised He has a modern post after a He suggested 500 billion dollars Investing in artificial intelligence technology.

Luxurious praise may seem to be a shift in the loyalty of technology leaders who have been considered historically more supportive of Democrats than Republicans. This transformation may be the result of Democrats during the era of former President Joe Biden, who embraces the anti -monopoly efforts that targeted major technology companies and becomes generally more critical to billionaires.

It seems that these technological fools are now eager to embrace a Republican leader who reduces their taxes, works against the union’s efforts, gives them government contracts and allows their companies to be large as they want.

Zephyr Teachout, a lawyer, author and associate professor at the University of Fordham, says adult technology leaders are not in line with Democrats, and this has become more clear than it was recent.

“Technology leaders were not with Democrats. Teachout said:“ They have always been compatible with power. ”In the Obama era, Google drew its arms and claws and to the Obama administration, and the mixture of cultural reasons and glow was, there was a feeling that great technology was, for the Democrats , “Our people.”

As The Intercept reported in 2016, the White House during the era of President Barack Obama had a very close relationship with Google. I have reached the point where Google leaders are providing management “experience, services, advice and employees for vital government projects.”

Nathan Schneider, Assistant Professor of Media Studies at Colorado University, Bulder, says business leaders are known to shine from left to right depending on who is in power. Labor relations are also a large part of the reason why technology executives are behind Trump.

“After the last Trump elections … many companies had employment uprisings in their ranks, as elite engineers and other employees organized the major working lines, such as China products and military contracts,” Schneider said.

“This affected these leaders, and they have made it clear that they did not want more of them. ELON Musk gave many other executives to purify their teams of trust and their safety. The embrace of tramp is another extension of this path.”

During the years of Biden, many technology companies saw that their employees are organizing the formation of unions and becoming more critical to the actions of their companies, such as concluding contracts with the American army. Musk was a prominent opponent of the Union for years, and has been able to overcome the resistance from his companies.

Trump’s embrace of political fit at the present time may feel, but it may not end until it is healthy in the long run. Trump has repeatedly shown that he would get rid of colleagues who were previously loyal to him, and the second do something he does not like or no longer. Executive managers may not feel the technology who now feel love soon.

“The date we saw from the first semester is that even if your friend is now, this does not mean that he will be your friend in a year,” says Mark Limley, a professor of law at Stanford University. “Even if there is an ideological alignment, and even if they believe that their companies will benefit from them from Trump’s absorption, this will happen so that he does not. He has no loyalty to them.”

From Steve Bannon, the chief strategy in Trump in the first few months of his first term, to many chiefs of staff to Anthony Scarmashi, also the director of communications in the first period, Trump was known to shoot people who were close to him during the beginning condition. After all, “YOUTAB” was a Catchphrase game as a realistic TV show host.

The role of Democrats

Now that the sand has turned, Democrats will have to decide how they will deal with the great technology to move forward. Will they continue to pursue anti -monopoly and fighting efforts for billionaire tax? Or will it be limited to these efforts to satisfy billionaires?

“Democrats should be part of people – workers or small business owners and local communities, whether in cities or small cities – and fight the generous mediators who steal wages, exploit consumers, and destroy the opportunity for small companies to flourish,”. “Democrats must be the Small Democratic Party, and this does not correspond to the huge octopus of power.”

Basically, Teachout says Democrats should not back down from their efforts to reform large billionaires of technology and taxes, and they should continue to struggle for the working class. She says Democrats need a clear agenda to dismantle large technology and recognize the threat posed by major technology on “innovation, equality and democracy”.

“I think they need a different approach mainly. Instead of focusing on solving problems in technology from top to bottom, the policy should focus on building power from the bottom to top, enabling societies to solve their own problems instead of enhancing the power of executive billionaires.”

“This means insisting that technology companies protect the interconnection capacity and the right of users to easily go out to other services. This means general investment in open source programs (including for artificial intelligence) that societies can operate and control.

Social media platforms such as Bluesky are designed, which have become common for left -wing Internet users who want to avoid platforms like Musk’s X, to be open and protect user rights. This may be an indication of the direction in which people go on the left when it comes to technology.

Limley says Democrats may not be able to accomplish much of anything at least in the next two years while Republicans control the House of Representatives and the Senate, but they can talk about technology -related issues and make the public beside them. He said that many audiences are already ready to go behind this type of messages that they could dare.

“I think the general feelings against Big Tech were growing greatly,” says Limley. January 24 reconnaissance From the Associated Press Nork Public Affairs Research Center, people show that people do not support billionaires participating in government policy.

It was not yet clear whether this separation between Democrats and large technology would be always, but it is clear that some in the Democratic Party was ready for that, because the algorithms that help their electoral possibilities.

“I think that new startups will have to make a common issue with Democrats at some point, whether it is immigration or education or just taking knowledge seriously, the Trump administration is not in fact a situation to encourage innovation in America or competitiveness in Limley says:” In the long run. “