An expert in the intimate relationship dismantles the controversy of Justin’s comment on the “smell”.

A newly displayed clip of the “IT Ends With Us” collection is wides Blake LivlyThe claims of sexual harassment against the co -star and the director Justin Balani.

The shots put a new light on a hot legal battle full of allegations and counter -allegations, including Blake Livley’s claim that Justin Balouni acted inappropriately during the filming of a romantic dance scene.

In her complaint related to civil rights, Lavelli accused the blush of pulling his lips down her neck during a written dance scene, and claimed that she was whispering, saying: “Her smell is very good.” She stated that no one heard this observation because the microphones were closed because of the silent scene.

And he answers the blog: “Its smell is good”, which causes the actors to laugh. Levli explains that the smell comes from her body makeup, which maintains the fun tone of its interaction.

This suspension was a pivotal point among fans who dissect the clip, but Mia Shetar, the coordinator of the intimate relationships that worked in “Lessons in Chemissry” on Apple TV +, “Insecure” on HBO, and “American Crime Story” on FX channel She said Hollywood Reporter People should look at the largest image.

She said: “With regard to the comment on the smell, for me, it is not about this comment specifically and whether the straw that divided the camel’s back or not.” “It seems as if she had a continuous list of moments when she felt uncomfortable and pressure, and that inappropriate things were happening. This line for me is something you might not notice even if you feel comfortable and safe.”

Shater admitted the complexity of the matter, “because it is clear that saying this in the personality is logical.”

She added: “Saying this outside the personality of the character, not a mistake or is not appropriate in its nature.” “But when there was increased discomfort and increased crossing of fonts, I can see how this becomes something outside the line.”

When discussing Daily MailThe video title says “Who is lying?” She admits that she does not think either of them is lying.

“I think they are talking about their own experience,” she said. Thr. “They really differ strongly about things like professionalism, etiquette of behavior, what is appropriate, what is not appropriate, and what it means to be an actor. There are still actors who say:“ All this must be organic. ”And“ Oh, I am sorry because I am I pressed you, I was at that moment. “

“Most of the coordinators of intimate relationships and the coordinators of exciting movements, if not all of them, will say:” Don’t do that. Do not accept someone if you did not have already talked about it. From the standards. “

At the end of the day, the Shareer feels that he should have been without interfering and making sure that Livley was comfortable to shoot the viewer.

“In a scene like this, without an intimate coordinator, I think it was his responsibility to ask Blake:” Hello, what do you think about kissing in this scene? “If this is what he wanted to see, but he did not ask her or even remember that he wanted to photograph him – he I just withdrew, then he did so again that was what he wanted to photograph, but he did not, for me, this is very bad, as an actor and director.

“Justin and his lawyer may hope that this last trick would outperform the harmful evidence against him, but the same video is condemned,” said Livly’s lawyer. TMZ. “Each of the published shots, with the message, supports what Mrs. Levli described in paragraph 48 of her complaint.”

The statement continues the details of the alleged behavior that appeared in the video, claiming that it appears in the inferior “he tilted frequently towards Mrs. Livly, tries to kiss her, accepts her forehead, rubs his face and mouth on her neck, and moves her lip with his finger.” The thumb, its caressing, and telling it about the magnificence of its smell, and talking to it outside the scope of its personality.

While the legal battle is revealed, the video raises important questions about how to interpret dynamics during filming and the challenges of distinguishing between written verbs and alleged misconduct. At the present time, the two sides remain steadfast in their two novels, leaving the Public Court of opinion to evaluate evidence.