When Washington backs down: What deregulation means for corporate leaders

1. The disappearing roadmap

Imagine that you are at a dinner party with your fellow executives. Someone asks: “What’s going on in your world right now?” A few years ago, the answer might have been inflation, supply chains, or talent retention. Today, another response is gaining more attention: the rules of the game are disappearing.

For decades, federal regulations have provided businesses with a roadmap and a shield. Compliance has provided legal protection, investor confidence, and a baseline for competitive fairness. This framework is now shifting across multiple sectors: finance, energy, environmental management, and consumer safety. Boards must navigate a landscape in which federal rules no longer provide clear standards, yet liability, reputation, and competitive pressures remain.

In a world dominated by uncertainty, how companies prepare for deregulation is one of the few levers of control available to leadership. It’s a moment to exercise foresight, proactively set company standards, and maintain credibility with employees, customers, and investors alike.

secondly. How we got here

US federal regulations have often been written in response to crises. Before national rules, businesses navigated a patchwork of state laws that were ineffective, inconsistent, and sometimes dangerous. Detecting unsafe food practices in the forest (1906) Led to the Pure Foods and Drugs Act and the Meat Inspection Act. Mine explosions and factory fires prompted the creation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), establishing basic safety standards. The stock market crash of 1929 exposed flaws in securities trading, prompting securities laws and the Securities and Exchange Commission to protect investors and enforce disclosure. Environmental disasters such as the Cuyahoga River fires and smog crises spawned clean air and clean water laws. Corporate fraud scandals, from Enron to WorldCom, gave rise to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, while the 2008 financial crisis gave rise to the Dodd-Frank Act and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Time and again, regulation has followed the upheaval, creating national standards to protect workers, consumers, investors, and the environment.

These features reveal a consistent pattern: crises prompted federal intervention, which reduced uncertainty, enabled the growth of national markets, and promoted long-term economic expansion. Although regulation is costly in the short term, it has created an infrastructure for sustainable and scalable businesses.

Fast forward to 2025: The federal government enacted a sweeping wave of deregulation across the environmental, labor, health care, and financial sectors, implementing a “10-for-1” rule that eliminated ten existing regulations for every new regulation introduced. The scale of this decline – environmental standards, financial oversight, and workplace protections – is of historical significance, leaving boards and CEOs having to navigate a much less predictable landscape.

Third. Effects and work

Deregulation shifts risks from public enforcement to corporate governance. The absence of federal backing creates legal uncertainty: compliance with repealed rules no longer provides a safe haven, and boards may face increased liability for oversight failures. Directors and executives should anticipate potential lawsuits, gaps in directors’ and officers’ insurance coverage, and reputational exposure, especially in areas historically protected by federal standards.

Competitive tensions are emerging. Companies that maintain strict safety and governance standards may incur higher costs, while others exploit regulatory loopholes to cut expenses. This difference can affect reputational capital, investor confidence and market position. Global considerations magnify the challenge: companies operating internationally must meet foreign regulatory standards regardless of U.S. deregulation, while domestic competitors may face different requirements at the country level.

Boards can take proactive steps. Mapping risks across business units, reevaluating compliance as a governance responsibility, and exploring voluntary certifications or alliances create new baselines for trust and safety. Regulatory sandboxes and safe harbors can be utilized wherever possible. Companies operating in multiple states may voluntarily adhere to higher standards to maintain consistency, which creates predictability of operations and signals reliability to stakeholders.

Strategically, companies that lead on governance and product safety can turn compliance into market advantage. Transparent reporting, stringent internal controls, and alignment of executive incentives and long-term risk management are essential leadership tools. Companies that treat safety, ethics, and governance as strategic differentiators can maintain investor confidence, attract customers, and enhance workforce engagement.

Deregulation also forces boards of directors to rethink how oversight is exercised. The historical reliance on federal regulation as a shield must give way to proactive governance, scenario planning, and aligning culture with risk management. In short, boards that act decisively can exert control over one of the few variables still under their influence: how their organization navigates an increasingly unregulated environment.

Fourth. Actionable conclusion

Rolling back federal regulations does not eliminate risk, it redistributes it. Boards and executives who treat deregulation as merely a cost-cutting opportunity may find themselves vulnerable to litigation, investor skepticism, or reputational damage. Those who approach it strategically can set industry standards, creating competitive advantage and long-term resilience.

Action steps for leadership teams include:

1. Map exposure: Identify where regulatory decline directly impacts operations, compliance and accountability.

2. Governance reassessment: Ensure that control structures, reporting sequences and monitoring processes reflect current and anticipated risks.

3. Establish voluntary standards: Approval of certifications, alliances, or internal protocols that exceed minimum legal requirements.

4. Communicate with confidence: Clearly communicate the company’s commitment to safety, ethics and long-term stability to investors, employees and customers.

5. Integration into the strategy: Treating organizational mobility as an essential element of risk management, competitive positioning, and capital allocation.

In an age of uncertainty, proactive boards gain clarity and control, shaping outcomes rather than reacting to them. Deregulation may remove government guardrails, but leadership, foresight, and disciplined execution remain tools that executives can control.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com reviews are solely those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs luck.