Killing a smartphone It is not easy to work; Just ask Sam Al -Tamman and Johnny. In May, former CEO of Openai and former Apple Designer, they would make a real and tangible tool that you can eventually keep with your real (supposed) unrealistic-not only any tool. As a new part A company called IOThe two are making Artificial intelligence tools. The tool, in the duo, is a step behind Revolutionary “third essence” screens and device. It is also, according to a new report, is not going well.
per Financial timesTechnical heavy weights work on “a palm -sized device without a screen that can take audio and visual signals from the physical environment and respond to user requests.” It is also “designed to sit on an office or table”, although it is also carried. They also have “after solving critical problems that can delay the release of the device.” What are these critical problems, ask? Well, you know, just basic things like getting the device to listen as well as get an arithmetic energy to make the device … it works.
Quoted from an unknown person familiar with events in IO: “Amazon has an Alexa account, as well as Google (for its home device), but Openai is struggling to get enough account for chatting, not to mention the AI-they need to fix that first.”

I am not a genius, Amnesty International, but Methenkher actually, the presence of a computer inside the computer will be a good start. I write a “good start” here, because it seems, even if this thing has a brain, his “personality” was not particularly leading to killing your smartphone. In this clear “personal” issue are actually multiple issues, so let’s start from the top; According to the Financial Times, the IO device has a camera and microphones, which is Always listen. It is also – if this does not start enough warnings – can be carried with you everywhere you go, and assume that everyone’s registration/everything you meet.
It is clear that this is Privacy nightmareEspecially looking at Openai’s General supervision of digital information for users. Moreover, it is also a tremendous challenge from the design point of view. , IO is designed to listen all the time and respond when necessary, but the company is struggling with coding the device in a way that responds when you want and close it when you don’t. I thought Google House It was bad.
Therefore, to summarize: Altman and IVE are fighting to operate the device, make it useful, and make (according to the design) towards another possible special smoothness. Did you get all of this? Oh, and to make things more exciting, it can be said that the state of artificial intelligence tools is more amazing than it was ever. Humanity, the company that made these animal vehicles, The temperature of artificial intelligence is exaggerated He did not do that half of what the company promised, was stripped for spare parts Sold to HP for all companiesSo this is a big name down.
Hyman’s step, rabbitIt does not work better. The company recently unveiled Rabbitos 2, which is strongly tended to the idea of coding your own applications and finally simplifies the R1 user interface to make it more dependent on the smartphone. Whether any of these things is another question. Almost 1.5 years have passed since the launch of R1, and has been crawling for life Very slow start.
It is clear that none of these companies are not good and wonderful resources like IO, but I am not sure that the problem, at this point, is really a resource. When it comes to artificial intelligence tools, there is still a lot to be discovered, such as: How do we make them work? Does people want this? Should we really wander in recording everything we do and say all the time forever? And yes, money (engineering, research and development) may solve some of that, but it cannot buy a market for something that people do not want. As in the Silicon Valley, Altman and IVE seem to discover this in the most expensive way.
https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2025/05/Jony-Ive-and-Sam-Altman-2-1200×675.jpg
Source link