Her writer Clint Eastwood hated a good reason

Without the West, Clint Eastwood will not become the legend of the screen he is today. The actor was not only the forefront as the man who does not have a name in the Sergio Leone Seminal trilogy. Fans believe it is the best movie for Eastwood). Throughout his career, he relied on this type that was very popular to increase his profile over and over again. But Eastwood was never satisfied with everyone, and it seems that in the seventies of the last century, “Gallan Sister Sarah”, the writer who was reaching the story disturbed the story in the first place.

Directed by Don Siegel and written by Albert Maltz, the mules of Sister Sarah “Eastwood” Hogan’s play, a soldier in the Civil War, after he saved Sherley McCillin’s nun from Panditz, joins the Mexican rebels as they take the invading French. They wrote the scenario “SARA” in the mid -sixties and was originally the intention of guidance. interview As “abortion”. It is clear that the director felt that his original vision of the love story was completely at risk, as Boetticher expresses the panic from the way he was directed to McLean to explain that she was not, in fact, a nun – a revelation that later came in the movie, but it was not already present in the original Boetticher treatment.

The man who wrote the original story of “Two Gulp Effitters for Sister Sarah” had a lot to say about the final movie as well, and Siegel was not allowed to stop the hook after attending the first show.

After working together on “Coogan’s Bluff” in 1968, Clint Eastwood and without a “Baghalin Sister Sarah” brought back in 1970, which will eventually become the second of five cooperation between the spouses. Just one year after the release of the movie, the actor/dual director of “The Beguild” has reunited and legendary Dirty Harry Before their uninterrupted situation was strengthened, as two of the collaborators in the manufacture of major films with “Escape from Alcatraz” in 1979. Perhaps West 1970 had not been celebrated such a prison drama, but she received a decent critical response and made a modest profit, and brought it around it 5 million dollars On a budget of $ 2.5 million.

However, one of the man who did not give the film was a positive review, Bodh Potcher, who made his feelings known to be recorded after the first show. In an interview in 1999 (cross Cinema sensesDirector Andrew Rosh told that he believed that the Westerner was “terrible”, adding that while Don Sikal was a “dear, dear friend”, he could not hide his feelings about the movie. Boetticher recalled the first show at the Pantages Theater in Los Angeles. “I was sitting with Ron Eli, actor. Actor, who is now a very dear friend for me … When we saw that picture, I said,“ The stupid sob in the theater was the pioneering man. He could not smell her breath? “According to the director, Ely suggested simultaneously, and Boetticher” woke up and hit these two players behind us, “Boetticher replied,” I hit Clint, and I will strike without. “

Budd Boetticher is certainly not the first writer of the Caling Eastwood/Don Siegel, who hated the way he translated his original text into the screen. John Milius, The writer was found behind the 1973 “Dirty Harry” supplement, Magnum Force, the important final productOn the pretext that the director and Eastwood have completely raised the description of Harry Kalhan and changed the original end to the recognition.

But while Melius seemed to keep most of Opprobrium to conduct interviews, he told Boeticher Siegel exactly what he thought about “the mules of Sister Sarah”. As he said to her, he called him the next day for the first offer and he met more criticism. “Without, how can you make a piece of nonsense like that?” Remember Potcher saying. He continued:

He said: “It is great to wake up in the morning and know that there is a check in the mail.” There was dead silence. I said, “You are sure of hell. He was without older.

Despite the removal of the film, the “mule of Sister Sarah” is still one of The most reduced Eastwood moviesMost of this is due to the chemistry between the pioneering man and Cereli McLeen. Perhaps he had not achieved the expectations of the original writer, but a copy of the film was definitely worked for most critics, even if it was not necessarily one of the most famous Westerners in Eastwood today.