Paul Hastings Partners: Fast food for public companies facing Shorter reports

However, the effect exceeds the fluctuation of the market in the short term. In the scene of litigation today, the prosecutors companies routinely seize stock holders on the reports of a short seller as the “appearance of truth” necessary to claim the loss of loss under Article 10 (B) of the Securities Exchange Act 1934 and Article 10B-5. The interaction between the sellers represents the short activists, the lawyer of the securities, the courts, the challenges, legal cases and business decisions that corporate leaders must expect.

A brief history of the reports of the short seller in litigation in securities

Short sellers have always been part of the American capital markets, but the practice of publishing reports similar to the aggressive investigation designed to transport markets on a questionable charge is a relatively recent phenomenon. The courts are generally considered these reports to doubt, but they will allow allegations to rely on reports to abandon the pleading stage under certain circumstances. As a result, relying on these reports on securities claims does not seem to be dissipated. The recent decisions highlight the advanced legal treatment:

• In Rofi Holding, Inc. SEC. Leg. , 977 F.3D 781 (9th Cir. 2020): The ninth department saw that the short challenge blog publications did not constitute a correction disclosure because the short seller had a financial interest to persuade others to sell and violate the representations of accuracy or completion, but it is qualified to analyze it by indicating that short reports can qualify as corrective disclosure if it reveals new and credible information, regardless of the publisher’s bias.
• In Redeanomics, Inc. , second. Leg2022 WL 784812 (SDNY Mar. 15, 2022): The southern province in New York found that two short reports were not corrective disclosure because it did not reveal a fact that was not previously disclosed in the alleged misleading statements.
• Saskatchwan Healthcare’s EMP. Prans Prens V. Ke Holdings Inc. , 718 F. Supp. 3D 344 (SDNY 2024): The court explained that although the reports of the short sellers should be seen with caution, the report of the short seller shown “had” sufficient indicators of reliability “to survive in the pleading stage and the” truth “of the report was an inappropriate realistic issue based on a proposal to dismiss. This decision sheds light on the exact reasons that the prosecutors will continue to rely on these reports to claim corrective disclosure And causal loss.
• At Re Genus Brands INT’L, Inc. SEC. Lig.763 F. Supp. 3D 1027 (CD Cal. 2025): The Central Central Province found that the report of a short seller did not support the allegations of corrective disclosure and causing loss because the information that re -fed the available market information is easily available.
• Defeo V. Ionq, Inc. 134 F.4th 153 (4th Cir. 2025): After the logic of the ninth circle in bifiThe fourth department recently confirmed a proposal to refuse that the stock holder failed to “scan the high tape to show that (the report of the short seller) revealed the truth” because the report relies on unknown sources of its non -public information and ensures the evacuation of extensive responsibility for the accuracy of opinions.

Combating, these cases confirm that the courts focus on the article: Was it really new information, which were detected? Or does the report only collect the current information and give up the accuracy of its views?

Seven things every company must look at

For companies, short seller reports pose a multi -dimensional threat:

• market: Stock prices may decrease in the wake of the report, which leads to the erosion of the value of shareholders and the belief of investor relations.
• Advance: Prosecutors companies rely on these reports to claim causation and “evidence” on the appearance of the fact of fraud.
• reputation: The narration of misconduct can remain, regardless of merit.

Failure to evaluate the appropriate response strategically (if any) can include these risks. The implementation of the following steps is necessary to successfully navigate in short reports.

1. Clarify the short report under the concession

The first step is to dissect the line line. Each claim must be explained to:

• Determine what is not true in reality or misleading.
• The mutual reference is the previous general disclosure of the company.
• Science data that may require clarification in future deposits.

This process must be performed under the supervision of the law to maintain the privilege of the client lawyer and protect work products. The disciplined and explained version of the report becomes an indispensable tool for directing the internal response, considering offensive litigation strategies, and preparing for potential securities.

2. Evaluation of general response and offensive options

It can deny the reflection of the opposite results. Responses must be examined through legal relations teams and investors. Offensive procedures include:

• press release Rene the allegations in the short report.
• Prepare the letters of stopping and stopping To the publisher or to the platforms hosting the report.
• Evaluation of defamation claims Where the report contains clear realistic assurances clearly.
• Evil with the organizers (For example, SEC, Finra, stock exchanges) When the report appears to be dealing with the market through misleading data.

Some companies have published strategic offensive tactics and have received immediate results, including sellers who delete a report and/or a decline. However, offensive action is not always advisable. Press bulletins related to the short report and litigation against short sellers often inflame their platform. Each position requires judgment.

3. Monitor the share price and trading activity

Impact on the share price is not just a problem in investor relationships – it directly constitutes exposure to litigation. The courts often look to market reactions as evidence of scientific loss. Companies: (1) track stock movements inside the day in the hours and days following publication; (2) Monitoring trading sizes and identifying abnormal patterns; (3) Evaluating the news or modern events to assess whether the alternative market factors may affect the movement of stocks instead of the short report itself; And (4) Evaluating if there is any modern shares holder that acquires large shares that may have interests to disable corporate governance.

The exact record of the market reaction can help defeat the amplifier causal theories.

4. Monitor the short activity of derivatives and derivatives

Short is often works through transparent structures, including barters and options. Companies must track short interest levels and trading derived at the time of the short report. High short activity can indicate coordinated campaigns.

Some companies involve specialized analysis companies to monitor unusual patterns. This intelligence can support defensive strategies, investor communications, and when necessary, referrals to the organizers.

5. Institution of a specialist with a short defense experience early

Defending the campaigns of the short seller is not the standard for securities. It requires advice with:

• Experience of defending activity To expect market -based tactics.
• Securities litigation experience For the framework of loss of loss and physical arguments.
• Ruling on crisis management To balance the disclosure obligations with reputable risks.

The company’s early lawyer involves coordination of the market response, disclosure strategy, and actual time litigation position.

6. Install the board of directors immediately

The short seller reports are major governance events. The paintings should be briefed immediately, and managers should exercise supervision, which must be reflected in the minutes. These practical processes are very important to protect the company’s interests and the interests of its shares. It is not customary, in fact, it is expected that any stocks in securities include the derivative litigant submitted by various shareholders. The company’s managers and their control jobs should be informed.

7. Think if you are dealing with long -term strategic investors and analysts on the sale side

It is usually wise to inform strategic or major investors in the long run. Direct connection from the company – instead of the media rotates – can help maintain confidence and reduce reputation damage. The company should also take advantage of the relationships with the allergic spacecrafts in an attempt to refute the thesis of the short seller.

conclusion

The reports of the short seller will continue. Business leaders who implement these practical elements will have the upper hand in the battle to restore order and maintain the company’s path.

The opinions expressed in cutting comments Fortune.com are only the opinions of their authors and do not necessarily reflect opinions and beliefs luck.

Fortune Global Forum Returns 26 to 27 October, 2025 in Rydah. Executive chiefs and world leaders will meet for a dynamic event for the call only forms the future of business. Apply for an invitation.