The new safety law in California, California, appears to be the organization and innovation. They do not have to clash

SB 53, The Safety and Transparency Bill of Artificial Intelligence in California The governor of the state, Gavin News, signed the law this weekIt is evidence that the Islamic State should not hinder the progress of artificial intelligence.

This is how Adam Belllen, Vice President of Policy in the Dawa Group led by youth, says in today’s episode of stocks.

“The truth is that the policy makers themselves know that we have to do something, and they know from working on a million other cases that there is a way to pass legislation that really protects innovation – which concerns me – while ensuring that these products are safe.”

In essence, SB 53 is a first bill in the nation This requires that AI laboratories be large transparent about their safety and security protocols-and specifically on how to prevent their disastrous risks, such as using electronic attacks on critical infrastructure or building vital weapons. The law also requires companies to adhere to these protocols, which will be implemented by the Emergency Services Office.

“The companies are already doing the things we are asking for in this bill,” Beline told Techcrunch. “They are testing safety on their models. They are launching models cards. Have they started switching in some areas in some companies? Yes. For this reason, such bills are important.”

Bellen also pointed out that some artificial intelligence companies have a policy on relaxing safety standards under competitive pressure. Openai, for example, publicly mentioned it It may “set” its safety requirements If the AI ​​competitor has released a high -risk system without similar guarantees. Belllen argues that policy can impose the current safety promises of companies, and prevent them from cutting corners under competitive or financial pressure.

While the general opposition of SB 53 was kept silent Compared to her predecessor SB 1047any NEWSOM was released last yearThe speech in the Silicon Valley and most of the artificial intelligence laboratories was that almost any Amnesty International list is a curse for progress and will eventually hinder the United States in its race to overcome China.

This is why companies such as Meta and VCS such as Andressen Horowitz, and powerful individuals such as Openai Greg Brockman are pumping hundreds of millions in PACS super to support politicians supporting any state elections. This is why those same forces earlier this year were pushed for Amnesty International It would prevent countries from organizing artificial intelligence for 10 years.

Encode Ai has managed an alliance for more than 200 organizations to work ProposalBut Pelin says that the battle has not ended yet. Senator Ted Cruz, who defended the endowment, is trying a new strategy to achieve the same goal of federal anticipation of state laws. In September, Cruz presented SandAnd that would allow artificial intelligence companies to apply for exemptions to temporarily overcome some federal regulations for up to 10 years. Belllen also expects an upcoming draft law that creates the Federal International Standard of Amnesty that will be shown as an average solution, but in reality it will exceed the laws of the state.

He warned that artificial intelligence legislation, which was defined with a small difference, could “delete federalism to the most important technology of our time.”

“If SB 53 tells me is a draft law that replaces all state bills on everything related to AI and all possible risks, I would like to tell you that this is not a very good idea and that this bill is designed for a specific sub -group of things.”

While it agrees that the race of artificial intelligence with China matters, and that policy makers need the age of regulations that will support American progress, the killing of state laws – which focus mainly on transparency, transparency, algorithm, children’s safety and government use of artificial intelligence – is not the way to do so.

“Are bills like SB 53 the thing that will prevent us from overcoming China?” He said. No. “I think it is intellectually to say that this is the thing that will prevent us in the race.”

He added: “If the thing that you care about is to hit China in the race on artificial intelligence – and I care about that – the things that you will pay for them are things like export controls in Congress.” “You can make sure that American companies have chips. But this is not what the industry pays.”

Legislative proposals such as Chips Security Law It aims to prevent the transfer of advanced artificial intelligence chips to China through export controls, tracking devices, and the current one Chips and Science Law It seeks to increase the production of local chips. However, some major technology companies, including Openai and Nvidia, have expressed their frequency or Opposition To certain aspects of these efforts, quoting concerns about effectivenessCompetitiveness and security weaknesses.

Nvidia has its reasons – it has a strong financial incentive to continue selling chips to China, which has Historically Like a large part of its global revenues. Bellen speculated that Openai can prohibit the advocacy of exporting chips to stay in good blessings for computer suppliers such as NVIDIA.

There were also inconsistent messages from the Trump administration. Three months after the expansion of the scope An export on advanced artificial intelligence chips to China In April 2025, the administration reflected the path, allowing NVIDIA and AMD to sell some chips to China in 15 % of revenue exchange.

“You see people on the hill moving towards bills such as the Chips Security Law, which will put export controls on China,” Bilin said. “Meanwhile, there will be this support from the narration to kill state bills that are actually very light.”

Belllen added that SB 53 is an example of democracy in work – industry and policy makers who work together to reach a copy of a bill that everyone can agree on. It is “very ugly and chaotic”, but “this process of democracy and federalism is the full basis of our country and our economic system, and I hope we will continue to do so successfully.”

“I think SB 53 is one of the best proof points that can still succeed,” he said.