The Environmental Protection Agency ends the collection of greenhouse gas data. Who will ascend to fill the gap?

Photo of author

By [email protected]


Environmental protection The agency announced earlier this month that it will stop making contaminated companies compare to their greenhouse gas emissions, eliminating a decisive tool that the United States uses to track emissions and form climate policy. Climate NGOs say their work can help bridge some data gap, but they and other experts fear that the work of the Environmental Protection Agency cannot be fully identical.

“I don’t think this system can be fully replaced,” says Joseph Goveman, former assistant Air and Radiation Office at the Environmental Protection Agency. “I think it can be rounded – but it will take some time.”

Clean air law It requires The states to collect data on local pollution levels, which countries receive the federal government. Over the past fifteen years, the Environmental Protection Agency has also collected data on carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases from sources throughout the country from which a specific threshold of emissions is emitted. Kevin Gourney, a professor of atmospheric science at North Arizona University, says this program is known as the GHGRP gases and “it is really the backbone of the air quality reporting system in the United States.”

Like countless data collection operations that have stopped or stopped since the beginning of this year, the Trump administration put this program at the intersection. In March, the Environmental Protection Agency announced that it would reconsider the entire GHGRP program. In September, the agency clarified a proposed base to get rid of reporting obligations from sources ranging from power plants to oil and gas refineries to chemical facilities – all major sources of greenhouse gas emissions. (Agency Claims GHGRP will save $ 2.4 billion in regulatory costs, and that the program “is nothing more than the bureaucratic red strip that does nothing to improve air quality.”

Joseph says that the closure of this program is a tendon of the knee “the main practical ability of the government to formulate climate policy.” Understand how new emissions reduce techniques, or scan industries that separate from the carbon that are not, “very difficult to do if you do not have this data.”

The data collected by GHGRP, which is available to the public, supports many federal climate policy: understanding the sectors that contribute to the types of emissions are the first step in forming strategies to reduce these emissions. This data is also the backbone of many US -American climate policy: greenhouse gas emissions data are assigned through the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which is subject to the Paris Agreement. (While the United States came out of the Paris Agreement for the second time on the first day of Trump’s second state, remains-Included-Port of UNFCCC.



https://media.wired.com/photos/68db9f4e0174ce774ca88052/191:100/w_1280,c_limit/092925_Science-US-Gov-Emissions%202.jpg

Source link

Leave a Comment