A federal judge said on Tuesday in a tremendous decision criticized by President Donald Trump and Israel’s criticism that the Trump administration violated the American constitution when it targeted non -citizens to deport only to support the Palestinians and Israel’s criticism on Tuesday in a massive decision and sharp criticism of Donald Trump and its policies as serious threats to freedom of expression.
The American boycott judge, William Young, in Boston, agreed with many university associations that the policy that they described as an ideological deportation violates the first amendment as well as the Administrative Procedures Law, a law that governs how federal agencies are developing and issuing them. Young also found that politics was “arbitrary or volatile because it reflects the previous policy without a logical explanation.”
“This case-the most important thing in the jurisdiction of this local court-may be directly exposed to whether the non-citizens who are legally here in the United States are already enjoying the same freedom of expression rights that our rest enjoys.
Prosecutors in the case welcomed the ruling.
“The Trump administration’s attempt to deport students for their political views is an attack on the constitution and a betrayal of American values,” said Todd Woluson, President of the American University Professors Union. “This trial revealed their real goal: intimidating and silencing anyone who dares them to oppose them.”
The ruling came after a trial during which the lawyers presented witnesses to witnesses that the Trump administration had made coordinated efforts to target students and scientists who criticized Israel or showed sympathy with the Palestinians.
“Not since McCarthy, the immigrants have been the target of the intense repression of legal political discourse,” Ramia Krishnan, the lawyer of the employees at the First Amendment Institute in Knight, told the court. “This policy creates a cloud of fear for university societies and is in war with the first amendment.”
Front stove27:41What is exactly ice?
The “frustrated” ruling: internal security
Tricia McLeulin, Assistant Security Security Secretary, issued a statement that did not address the ruling directly, but said that Young “stains and a devil enforcement of federal law”, while referring to Fight firing this month In a ice facility in Texas.
She said, “We ice enforcement must be thanks to our ice for risking their lives every day to arrest the killers, pedestrians, rapists, gang members, and terrorists instead of refuge politicians.” “It is a frustrating thing that even after the terrorist attack and the recent arrests of riots in guns outside the ice facilities, this judge decides to delay the hatred of hatred.”
Although McLeuline explained, Data from ice She revealed that the vast majority of detainees by immigration authorities do not have well -known criminal condemnation or criminal charges.
Trump administration attorneys developed witnesses who witnessed that there was no ideological deportation policy as the prosecutors claimed.
John Armstrong, official of the first office at the Consular Affairs Office, witnessed that the visa evokes are based on the long -term immigration law. Armstrong admitted that he played a role in nullifying the visa of many prominent activists, including Romisa Ozturk and Mahmoud Khalil, and offered notes that support her removal.
Khalil, a graduate of Columbia University, was released last month 104 days after federal immigration. Married to an American citizen, Khalil is still voice.
Oztuk, Tuffs, was released in May of six weeks in detention after his arrest on Boston’s suburbs. She said that she was illegally detained after an editorial that was co -authored by Ozturk and three others, which criticized her school’s response to the war in Gaza.
Front stove25:38Will recognition lead to a Palestinian state?
Unprecedented targeting, the ice official is witnessing
Armstrong also insisted that the visa evocation was not based on a protected speech and rejected accusations that there was a policy to target someone on his ideology.
Peter Hatch, of the ICE internal investigation unit, witnessed that the campaign targeted more than 5,000 pro -Palestinian demonstrators, and Federal investigators wrote reports about about 200 who violated American law. Until this year, Hatch said, he could not remember a student demonstrator who is referred to cancel a visa.
The Minister of Internal Security for Internal Security Christie Nom, Foreign Minister Marco Rubio and their agents in the abuse of their powers to target non -citizens who were supporters of the municipalities for their silence, and thus, “intentionally denying these individuals (including the plaintiffs here) the freedom of the right to express their right.”
Young Trump also criticized his 161 -page rule, indicating that he supported politics, although he might have not authorized his operation.
He wrote: “The facts prove that the president himself agrees with explicit and unconstitutional repression of freedom of expression” by two senior cabinet secretaries.
Young will hold a separate hearing on the relief requested by the prosecutors, which is likely to be a request that the Trump administration will stop engaging in ideological deportations.
https://i.cbc.ca/1.7647872.1759317462!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_1180/trump.jpg?im=Resize%3D620
Source link