Democrats were afraid of the Trump plan to deliver plutonium at the level of weapons to private companies

Members of the Democratic Party express suspicion of the alleged Ministry of Energy Plan (DOE) to give at least 20 metropolis of weapons bullonium to the private sector to use commercial energy.

The democratic Senator Ed Marki explained in a letter For President Trump last week, he repeated the arguments he and the members of the Democratic Congress, Donald Bayer and John Garhamdi previously letter Earlier this month.

Plutonium in the reactor fuel

Plutonium It is a radioactive element, most of which is human made and used for various purposes. All American commercial nuclear reactors Light water reactionsAnd that creates a plutonium when uranium is divided into the fission. Some of the plutonium also, but not all, which means that 1 % of the weight of the fuel of the nuclear reactor that has been spent in the United States is plutonium.

“Re -processing” is when plutonium is separated from the fuel spent. Plutonium can nourish nuclear power plants, but since it can also be used in nuclear weapons, re -treatment is a controversial process. The United States currently does not have a commercial re -processing program in the country, according to the US Nuclear Organizational Committee.

Legionships argue that the United States has avoided the commercial use of plutonium and challenges the reproduction of re -processing technology for decades “to prevent countries with nuclear power plants from being able to extract plutonium from this fuel, or who can fall into their hands – they can use nuclear weapons,”.

“Your plan – which will provide American companies Plutonium from US military stocks and support them alike to re -process a domestic plutonium technology and export technology – will reflect the policy of successful non -proliferation,” the legislators continued. “The United States cannot effectively inhibit other countries from using plutonium for civil purposes if we use them ourselves.”

Messages come in the wake of an article Reuters Reporting that the Trump administration plans to give plutonium from the nuclear warheads that have been dismantled to energy companies as a potential reactor fuel.

End the excess behavior program from plutonium

In May, President Trump signed an executive official to request Directing the Minister of Energy, Chris Wright, to form a program to treat the surplus of plutonium and make it available for reactor fuel and stop the program of excess behavior of plutonium as it is allowed by law, according to what he said Fact paper. The system places the context of the transition to the “Nuclear Energy Industrial Base in America” ​​in the global artificial intelligence race, among other things.

Also, the Senator Marqui’s message on September 23 calls for conflicting interests clearly within the entire dynamism; Al -Amin Wright was previously on the OKLO board, a nuclear technology startup and the “main interested company” in obtaining a plutonium from the Ministry of Energy.

“I am concerned that your administration is progressing with plans of transportation to Oclo and allowing it to build a processing factory not because these suggestions are logical for the United States,” Senator writes, “but because Oklo will benefit financially and that the Minister of Wright is behaving in the interest of his previous company.”

Plutonium is a nuclear weapon

Moreover, according to the rear policy a reportMore than five of the Blloonium needed to meet Trump’s energy directions will come from the pits of plutonium – radiological nuclei of nuclear weapons. But the Ministry of Energy is already struggling to meet the authorization of Congress to intensify the production of the hole to modernize the American nuclear arsenal.

It remains to see how nuclear energy strategies in the United States and nuclear weapons will continue to develop over the next three years – aspects of the same currency that will provide cleaner energy or demolish our civilization.