The momentum is the power of the Gaza Plan Trump, but the lack of details is its weakness

Donald Trump’s framework agreement to end the Gaza war and rebuild the devastating lands is momentum behind it.

Many of them come from the president himself. The momentum also comes from the leading Arab and Islamic countries that supported the plan, including Jordan, Egypt, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Pakistan, Indonesia and Turkey. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who stands beside Donald Trump, also accepted, although he contains a conversation through a Palestinian state, and has repeatedly condemned it.

To keep a pace, Trump says Hamas has “three to four days” to decide whether he will say yes or not.

If the answer is no, then the war continues.

The proposed deal looks like the plan that Joe Biden has developed more than a year ago. Since then, there has been tremendous killing of Palestinian civilians, more destruction in Gaza, and now famine, while the Israeli hostages in Gaza had to bear more months than torment and families.

There were many reports in the Israeli media that the Biden initiative failed because Netanyahu transferred the goal goals with a new set of demands – under pressure from the solid right to the cabinet.

However, the framework plan is an important moment. For the first time, Donald Trump presses Israel to end the war. Donald Trump has made himself in a leader who is difficult to say no. Nobody wants to end up preparing Ukraine President Volodimir Zelinski at the Oval Office in February. But things can change when leaders leave the White House.

Before Benjamin Netanyahu left Washington, DC to return to Israel, his employees photographed him, putting him on his novel. One of the elements was the idea of ​​an independent Palestine next to Israel, a solution consisting of the two countries in which the United Kingdom and other Western countries tried to revive it through recognition of Palestine.

The Trump document gives an unlimited signal to the idea of ​​Palestinian independence. She says that after the reform of the Palestinian Authority, which is based in Ramallah and its leaders, President Mahmoud Abbas, the circumstances may be “in the end in the way of a reliable path to self -determination and the state, which we realize as the aspirations of the Palestinian people.”

Even thinking about a distant possibility of a Palestinian state was too much for Netanyahu, which has provided fully support to Trump in the White House, and told him in English, “I support your plan to end the war in Gaza, which achieves our targets for the war.”

On the video, he delivered his message in Hebrew to people at home before a long flight, and Netanyahu is asked whether he agrees to a Palestinian state. It was certain.

“No, certainly no. He didn’t even write in the agreement. But we said one thing. We will resist by force a Palestinian state.” He said that Trump agreed.

The momentum is the power of the plan. Its weakness is the lack of details, a feature of Trump diplomacy. The document approved by Trump and Netanyahu, which also has support from the United Kingdom and other European countries, comes with an approximate map of the back of the back of the IDF, but there are no nuts and nails that determine whether diplomatic agreements are designed to end the war or disintegration.

If so, serious negotiation will be necessary. In this process, there will be many opportunities for its collapse.

The main opposition parties in Israel approved the plan. It was condemned by extremist extremists in the Netanyahu coalition, who loved the Trump Riviera plan at the beginning of the year, was launched with a strange video showing Israeli leaders and United States in beach equipment to cocktails against the background of the new Gazan screen carts. The Israeli right was pleased that the Rivera plan included removing all more than two million Palestinians in Gaza. Jewish extremists want to include the land and replace the Palestinians with the Jewish settlers.

The new plan says that the Palestinians will not have to leave. Paisallil Soutrich, extremist finance minister and settler leader, compared Munich’s approval this week in 1938. In Munich, the United Kingdom and France forced Czechoslovakia to surrender and not long after its independence in Nazi Germany.

If the enthusiasm accepts the agreement, and if Benjamin Netanyahu wants to find ways to purify Sottic and other extremists who keep his alliance in power, he will have many opportunities to sabotage negotiations in ways to blame Hamas. The structure of the Trump framework agreement provides Israel with a set of opportunities for veto moves that you do not like.

It may not be possible to end a deep -rooted struggle that lasted more than a century. In the long run, the United Kingdom and many countries outside Israel and the United States believe that any attempt does not lead to Palestinian independence will not bring peace.

When foreign ministers in the Arab and Islamic countries issued a statement of their support, they said that they believed that this would lead to a complete Israeli withdrawal and the rebuilding of Gaza, and “a road for just peace based on the two -state solution, according to which Gaza is completely integrated with the West Bank in the Palestinian state in accordance with international law.” This can be considered an encrypted reference to the International Court of Justice’s decision that the occupation of Palestinian territories by Israel is illegal.

Netanyahu believes that the deal takes it closer to Israel’s long -standing victory over Hamas. It denies any Palestinian right on the ground between the Jordan River and the sea.

One plan, two copies completely different to what it means. The frame is mysterious enough for both possible interpretations. This is not a promising start.