Supreme Court in the United States with Trump by freezing $ 4 billion in foreign aid Donald Trump News

The lower court had previously ordered Trump to pay the aid approved from Congress before its expiration date.

The US Supreme Court stood up again with President Donald Trump to allow him to freeze $ 4 billion in foreign aid from his disbursement.

On Friday, which reflects the minimum court, the Trump administration’s victory in its efforts to reform the United States for humanitarian efforts and other efforts abroad.

It is also the latest example of the U.S. -dominated United States Court that gives a widespread explanation for the presidential authority.

The aid concerned has already been approved by Congress, but his license has been clarified by September 30. Trump Go to freeze Aid in a process known as “pocket cancellation”, mainly over the clock.

The funds were allocated, partly, for United peacekeeping operations and democratic promotion efforts abroad.

On September 3, the American boycott judge, Amir Ali I command Trump to pay money before the expiration date. He warned that Trump’s move sparked “a serious and urgent threat to separate the forces.”

Under the constitution of the United States, Congress has the authority of the portfolio, and there is a few precedents for the president who dates back to the back of the back that the legislative branch has already agreed. The White House said that the “pocket cancellation” tactic was used last time in 1977.

In the court files in the case of the Supreme Court, the administration’s attorneys have argued that the funding of financing will be “in violation of the American foreign policy.”

Trump sought to repair US foreign aid, United Nations funding and greatly dismantling the United States Agency for International Development (USA International Development Agency).

The administration frame the discounts as an effort to curb spending while increasing funding to enforce local immigration.

Critics said that the cuts undermine the soft power in Washington abroad and can threaten us with long -term interests.

The Supreme Court at the Supreme Ghos 6-3 sided with the Trump administration in almost every case, and often adopts a widespread interpretation of the previously tested boundaries of the US executive authority.