Amid discussions about Freedom of expression and controlThere is another issue that must be taken into account in the wake of Jimmy Kimmel is pulled from air For his comments about the killing of extremist right-wing activist Charlie Kirk-does it matter if the joke is wrong?
It is not an ethical or “offensive” mistake, Some critics also arguedBut, perhaps, incorrect.
ABC, the broadcaster, owned by Walt Disney, said on Wednesday that he was screaming Jimmy Kimmel Live! Undially after the country’s highest communications organizer Threaten Kimmel’s comment about Kirk, Trump’s ally.
Talk to CNBC on ThursdayThe head of the Federal Communications Committee (FCC) Brendan Carr said that the case is that Kimmel seemed to “mislead” the public.
Which raises questions, like what Kimmel said exactly, whether it is incorrect and important because he is comic and not a journalist.
US President Donald Trump said, when he was asked during a press conference with UK Prime Minister Kiir Starmer about a step by ABC to remove Jimmy Kimmel from the air, the host of the dialogue program said, “A terrible thing” about Charlie Kirk – but he attributed the decision of “bad categories” and “lack of talents”.
“The Venn chart is thrown for the comedy and the truth a lot.” the BeveronTell CBC News.
“I think political comedians and journalists bear similar responsibilities – to talk about what is going on. But these responsibilities are dealt with from very different views but it is going on.”
What exactly Kimmel said?
The comments came during the opening monologue on Monday.
“We have reached the lowest new levels during the weekend, as a desperate Maga gang tried to describe this child who killed Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and with everything they can, to score political points from him,” Kimmel said.
ABC said on Wednesday that she would stop broadcasting until Jimmy Kimmel Live broadcast! After statements, the host was late at night following the killing of Charlie Kerk.
Kimmel said, before cutting a clip as Trump responded, at the human level, at the human level, “
“This is the way a four -year -old is saddened by a golden fish,” he said.
Which part does critics face a problem?
The first part, where Kimmel said that Maga “is trying desperately describing this child who killed Charlie Kerk as anything other than one of them.”
“The case that arose here, where many and many people were annoying, were not a joke.” Carl told CNBC.
“It seemed to be misleading the American public directly from an important fact Perhaps this is one of the most important political events that we have been exposed to for a long time, for the most important political assassination that we have seen long ago. ”
Kirk, a close conservative ally of Trump, was killed by a sniper on September 10 on a university campus in Utah. On September 12, the authorities announced that she had the accused killer, Tyler Robinson, 22 years old, in reservation.
There was a lot of speculation about a possible motive, with Politicians and the party Try to blame the other side. Trump blames the “radical left”, “ While others did some theoretically The messages on lead covers It can be connected Suspected.
Was Kimmil misleading?
At that time, Kimmel said on Monday, the investigators have not yet provided many information about the potential motivation of the suspect. Robinson has not explicitly tied with both sides of the political spectrum.
“This was at best unconfirmed rumors at the time, and with more evidence appearing, it seemed incorrectly incorrect. Kimmel should have chosen his words more carefully.” An article in the Atlantic Ocean Thursday.
It was the next day, Tuesday, that Prosecutors explained evidence against RobinsonIncluding the sayings of his parents, which I described as moving a political left and “to become more supportive of gay and equip the rights.”
“Any statement on such a complex issue” deserves a lot of context, “said Saranaz Parvorus, an assistant professor of teaching at the University of Columbia University of Columbia. She explained that Kimmel could have mentioned that we did not know anything tangible about the suspect, or any evidence of his relationships with Maga.
“Well, there wasn’t there. So people took the way they took it,” Parforus told CBC News.
But Blackwood, writer l BeveronNotes Kimmel did not say that the suspect was a member of Maga at all, but Maga was trying to prove that he was not one of them, as a joke about Trump’s response.
“This is not a lie,” she said. “The Republicans tried to turn any potential connection with the shooter as far as possible by blaming the left.”
Point InstituteA non -profit media institute, who presented the same argument, where he wrote on its website on Thursday that Kimmel’s comment does not seem to blame the Maga community to shoot Kirk, “but the Maga community blamed the left and tried to score political points from him.”
CBC News has already reported how Promotion of cracking on what Trump calls “radical left” groups He started in hours of shooting on Kirk, and was amplified by his administration on a daily basis in the following week.
Is it necessary to hold comedians at the same level as journalists?
Whether it is misleading or not, as the Atlantic Ocean indicates, Kimmel is “comic, not a journalist”.
But does this mean that the comedians in the show late at night are not detained on the same standards as journalists, although they broadcast their politicians to millions of viewers?
It is similar, but it is different, Blackwood explained. She said that journalists are expected to be non -party and present the two sides of the case, while the comedians and mockery are expected to have a funny view of a specific aspect of the case.
“Frankly, if they don’t do it, it makes the bad and weak comedy,” she said.
The former entertainment correspondence, Ali Carpon, says she is concerned that the United States is entering a “dangerous place for controlled media” after Jimmy Kimmel Live! It was pulled from the air. ABC said on Wednesday that she would stop broadcasting indefinitely after his observations late at night about the reaction to the assassination of Charlie Kerk for harsh criticism from the Chairman of the US Federal Communications Committee.
“The comedy should be informed … the more information you have, the more you have to work with it. But I think there is a line between frank lying and setting the truth for the joke.”
Barforoush pointed out that many of these comedies late at night are examined. Over the years, many comedians and comedians discussed late at night Verify strict facts and research Required because the offers have become more political.
“You cannot build jokes on the sand,” John Oliver, a host of Last week tonightand NPR said Again in 2016. “You cannot be wrong in something – otherwise this joke is only disintegrated.”
Barforoush says she is concerned about the effects of Kimmel withdrawal from the air, given that it is a source of information for many people and provides an alternative way to interact with current affairs.
If we will discuss verifying facts, we must discuss both sides of it.
“If we will say that anything that continues late at night must be verified, then anything that is going on in the far right must be verified, too.”
https://i.cbc.ca/1.7637019.1758204405!/cpImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_1180/tv-jimmy-kimmel.jpg?im=Resize%3D620
Source link