“Earn less than those I lead”: Redditors reveals the harsh truth in the salary game in India

A senior analyst at the Indian Information Technology Services Company was amazed to discover that two of the novice team members who informed him were gaining much more – although less experience and lower responsibilities.

The revelation, the common in the place of the Indian sub -action, ignited a greater debate about the disparity of wages, the culture of negotiation, and how compensation is often formed by timing and former employers more than skills or seniority.

The analyst explained that his salary was able to compete when he joined 85 % of his previous role. But he later learned that his young, who came from companies offering higher salaries, got 30-40 % more than he did. He said that the contradiction was not just numbers – I felt as if it was ignored to complicate his work, heavier responsibilities, and the pressure he carries daily.

“I contribute more, and take more ownership – however, I earn less than those I lead,” he wrote.

Very cautious about facing human resources directly, he was afraid that he would be called the complaint. The Reddit community responded with a practical advice.

One of the popular response urged him to request a “market correction”, supported by solid data and a clear record of achievements. Others participated in personal experiences, and they warned that the effort alone rarely leads to fair salaries unless it was associated with negotiation or the key to strategic jobs.

One of the commentators advised frankly: “Always keep the question, and switch if they did not match or agree.”

Another note, “I am doing three projects for $ 25,000. The colleague who holds a lighter load gets $ 38,000 – and graduate support. It seems unfair and installed.”

Some have warned against facing human resources very early. Instead, they suggested the water test by discussing the market trends in one on one with its manager and quietly lining up external offers before moving.

Ultimately, the message was clear: the entitlement is important – but only when associated with the strategy. Those who do not negotiate, lose.