California lawmakers once again challenge the NEWSOM technical relationships with the artificial intelligence bill

Last year, the governor of California Gavin News Veto A Population violently (Among the audience) and Controversial (Between Technology Companies) Bell, who would have set strong safety guidelines to develop and operate artificial intelligence models. Now he will have a second shot – this time with at least part of the technology industry that gives it green light. on saturday, Legionships passed through California Senate Law 53, a historical legislation that requires artificial intelligence companies to undergo new safety tests.

Senate Law 53Who is now awaiting the signing of the ruler to become a law in the state, it will require companies to build “Frontier” AI models – consecutive systems that require huge amounts of data and computing power – to provide more transparency in their operations. This will include the disclosure of safety incidents that involve serious or deceptive behavior by independent artificial intelligence systems, provide more clarity in safety and security protocols and risk assessments, and provide protection for those who are concerned about the possible damage that may come from the models they work on.

Certainly the draft law – which will be applied to the work of companies such as Openai, Google, Xai, Anthropic and others – has been exposed from previous attempts to create a wide safety framework for the artificial intelligence industry. For example, the draft law achieved by Newsom caused veto against newsom last year, created a mandatory “killing key” for models to address their rogue capabilities. This is not anywhere you can find here. A previous version of SB 53 has also applied safety requirements to smaller companies, but this may have changed. In the edition that has passed the Senate and Assembly, companies that bring to less than $ 500 million in annual revenue should not disclose high -level safety details instead of granular information, For every politician– Partially change at the request of the technology industry.

Whether it’s sufficient to satisfy the newsom (or more specifically, it satisfies the technology companies he wants to continue from Campaign contributionsIt has not yet been seen. Antarbur recently eased the legislation, chosen Throw his support behind him Just a few days before it officially passed. But commercial groups are like Consumer Technology Association (CTA) and Progress roomIt is calculated between member companies such as Amazon, Google and Meta, came out in opposing the bill. Openai also She indicated her opposition To the regulations followed by California without SB 53 specifically naming.

After the Trump administration tried Failure to implement a 10 -year stop The countries that implement the AI ​​regulations, California has an opportunity to lead this issue – this is logical, given that most companies are at the forefront of the area operating within their borders. But it seems that this fact is part of the reason Newsom is very shy to withdraw the trigger On the regulations though Everything he has in many other issues. His political ambitions require money for employment, and that Companies have a lot of them to present.