In a step, it attracts great attention through the technology industry, Nvidia Corporation Public criticize The recently proposed gain law, focusing on its ability to strangle competition in the sophisticated artificial intelligence sector quickly.
The Law of Gaining from Artificial Intelligence, which symbolizes the guarantee of access and innovation of the National Artificial Intelligence Law, was introduced as part of the American National Defense Licensing Law, with the aim of ensuring that the United States is the prevailing market force of Amnesty International.
It has not yet passed and is still the subject of hot policy here and outside it because of the restrictions he aspired to.
Supporters say it aims to protect the interests of the American market by setting the priorities of local demands for advanced artificial intelligence treatments, as well as safe supply chains of critical artificial intelligence devices, and theoretically reduce our dependence on foreign manufacturers.
Therefore, it is not surprising that NVIDIA, a Chinese company and the largest company in the world, is not currently aimed at a law that may restrict the competitiveness of foreign technology.
The company said as much as the last industry forum.
“We do not deprive American customers to serve the rest of the world. In an attempt to solve a problem that does not exist, the proposed law will restrict competition all over the world in any industry that uses prevailing computing chips,” A NVIDIA spokesman said.
Is the gain from artificial intelligence a good idea of innovation?
This depends on who you ask.
Basically, the law seeks to enhance national security and economic competitiveness by ensuring that the main AI components remain accessible to American companies and government agencies before providing them abroad.
Her language takes a difficult line on what should be priority for the United States government.
“The United States and the Ministry of Commerce must reject the licenses of the export of the strongest artificial intelligence chips, including these chips with a total treatment force of 4800 or higher and to restrict the export of advanced artificial intelligence chips to foreign entities as long as the United States’ entities wait and not to obtain these chips themselves,” Read the legislation.
NVIDIA’s criticism reflects the broader industry concerns about the organizational environments that may hinder innovation. With the intensification of global competition, especially with the tremendous progress in artificial intelligence from regions such as China, companies such as NVIDIA are closely monitoring how organizational frameworks are formed abroad.
But they are not only foreign companies. The American market players also said that they may reach many local operations.
“The advanced artificial intelligence chips are the jet engine that will enable artificial intelligence in the United States during the next decade,” said Brad Carson, the head of the Americans, on the responsible innovation (ARI), a pressure group in the artificial intelligence industry, in a widely distributed statement.
Carson said: “At the global level, these chips are currently dedicated, which means that every advanced segment was sold abroad is a chip that the United States cannot use to accelerate American research, development and economic growth.” “While we are competing for the leadership in this double use technology, including the Gain Ai Law in NDAA will be a great victory for the American and national economic competitiveness protection“
“The imagination of torment”
Nafidia did not stop there. After that, it took a previous attempt to make the United States more competitive in the Chipmaker market, a policy called the base of artificial intelligence, which eventually failed.
The chopped company, no words In the follow -up statementAnd, saying that the previous attempts of the legislators to control the market forces based on protectionist policies were ultimately a bad idea.
“The base of the spread of artificial intelligence was a policy of self -defeat, based on the imagination of science, and it should not be revived.”
“Our sales to customers around the world do not deprive American customers of anything – and in fact, expand the market for many American companies and industries.” “Critics who feed fake news for Congress about the offer of chips are trying to turn the action plan from President Trump’s artificial intelligence and hand over America’s opportunity to lead in artificial intelligence and account all over the world.”
The challenge will be the creation of dynamic laws such as technologies aimed at judgment, which enhances an atmosphere in which innovation and moral accountability are not mutually exclusive, but rather mutual enhancement.
We have tried this before
NVIDIA’s mention of the prevalence of artificial intelligence was not. This fateful policy had many of the same political goals, but it eventually stumbled in the finish line and was a relatively non -teeth attempt to curb some of the most competitive companies in the world.
The Biden Administration of AI in January 2025 is a major transformation of US export controls targeting advanced artificial intelligence technology.
The list was designed to design the spread of advanced artificial intelligence tools to the competing countries. The list imposed a license to sell advanced artificial intelligence chips and imposed strict covers on the power of available computing for foreign receivables. Its goal was to slow down the spread of sensitive artificial intelligence capabilities that could enhance military or strategic applications abroad.
However, the Trump era approach to export controls, which focused on a more targeted bilateral framework, was about to replace the broader Biden administration strategy.
President Trump has announced plans to cancel the base of the spread of artificial intelligence, and criticized it as an excessive bureaucracy and may hinder American innovation. Instead, his administration has preferred to participate in the country’s own agreements to control export practices, with the aim of a more adaptable approach, separately.
Although the base of the spread of artificial intelligence was eventually deported, the Industry and Security Office (BIS) indicates the renewal of the focus on the application of current regulations. The agency issued a notice to enhance measures against companies with a “high” probability of violations, warning that increasing the audit of entities be applied while knowing possible violations.
Whether this last attempt to enhance American interests meet a similar fate, it still should be seen.
https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2025/09/huang.jpg
Source link