Waymo says that you do not get her clips without order

Waymo quietly draws new boundaries on how authorities reach data from their independent cars. the The company said He will reject any requests that are not supported by a legal application such as a judicial order or a court order.

This step is one of several indicating increasing tension between innovation, privacy and law enforcement power.

A new privacy contest

Waymo Co-CEO TEDEDRA MAWAKANA Recently The company will challenge, restrict, or reject requests for Robotaxi footage from the application of the law that are not supported by a valid legal process, such as a judicial order or the court order.

she This is confirmed While the company “follows the legal process to receive footage”, it reserves the right to retreat from excessive or excessive demands – a step aimed at maintaining the confidence of the contestants.

Each Waymo vehicle is equipped with 29 external cameras, providing a comprehensive view of 360 degrees, and potential additional internal sensors. Those devices Create new monitoring limitsPay concerns about the misuse of private data.

WIRED mentioned earlier that although Waymo does not correspond to official legal requests, the company does not reveal the number of times or under any circumstances that are shared. This led to Questions about keeping dataRisk Using, crawling monitoring, especially when typical behavior is invisible to the public.

Law, trust and general perception

Waymo’s position is not just a policy. It is a strategic response to advanced general expectations. The company is now systematically informing the public when law enforcement requests arise, on the pretext that this transparency is very important to maintain the confidence of society.

Legal scholars It is located in an unstable areaAlthough it is subject to the protection of the fourth amendment, achieving a balance between privacy and legal investigation needs are still accurate.

Waymo pre -emptive position It contradicts sharply With other players driving. Police used previous footage of Robo their tax during investigations into protest, but they always follow orders or summonses.

However, the company faced sabotage and the general reaction in the hot moments, such as when robotics were burned during the demonstrations, intensifying concerns about public safety and safety.

When returning back, Waymo refers to a paradox of autonomy: that it is accepted, the robotics should be fixed not only safe, but also respect the rights. Legal clarity and public confidence may prove that they are more valuable than the same footage, in forming the organizational and cultural road map of independent movement.