No, Trump cannot weaken the United States elections by law

With Trump Administration assaulting both the soul and the message of the United States constitution numerous FrontsPresident Donald Trump has also become increasingly noisy – and controlled him – in his plans to manage the American election.

After nearly a decade of federation and state Investing in security initiatives in elections and integrityThe researchers and election officials working on the ground throughout the country were clear The infrastructure of the American elections Strong and transparent as before. In a march Executive order The subsequent comments on social media, though, Trump promoted an unfounded summit that the US election infrastructure was suspended and unreliable, which require federal intervention.

Trump administration also has reducing A large part of the electoral security work of the federal government and installed officials within the Ministry of Internal Security who deny the health of Trump’s presidential loss for the year 2020. Recently, the promoter of the conspiracy theory in the elections has been appointed Heather Hani as Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Safety of the Election in the US Department of Internal Security In late August.

Remember that the states are just a “agent” of the federal government in calculating and tabing votes, “Trump books On the social truth last month. “They must do what the federal government tells them, as the President of the United States represents.”

Non -party election experts emphasize that this is completely inaccurate and misleading interpretation US constitution The decentralized election model, which is controlled by the country that describes it.

“It is correct in the constitution from the beginning, the first article, that the countries have set time, place and the election method. Countries can manage the elections; Congress can add rules, but the president has no role,” says Lawrence Norddin, Vice President of the Elections and Government Program at the Brennan Center at the New York University Law Faculty. “Trump makes all these statements that he will finish voting on the mail, and that voting machines cannot be trusted, but he cannot do so. He certainly has the pulpit of fatwa, despite the misinformation and dissipation of the audience – and the intimidation of intimidation.”

Pamela Smith, the confirmed voting president, a non -party non -partisan organization that enhances the integrity of the election system, emphasizes that it is very difficult to decipher and dismantle the concerns raised by the administration from the inherent use of the presidency as a way to try to extend the requirements of the division. “It is really difficult to talk about all this when the context is wrong,” Smith says. “It is not due to the White House to say the election assistance committee,” you must change how you have a automated certificate to vote and cancel its identification. “

Bin Adida, Executive Director of Non -Perstantial Source Voting Equipment, notes that it is good to encourage government and local officials to set the priorities of elderly voting machines so that they can comply with the best practices and current standards. He says this was a “positive development” of the executive order for the month of March, although it also notes that “the timing proposed in this executive matter is very narrow so that it could not be realistic.”