Ridley Scott went through a major science fiction continuation (big imminent)

Few directors have longevity, success or diversity in their career that Ridley Scott had. At the age of 87, the man behind “Blade Runner”, “Alien” and “Gladiator” and many other classics are still completely active – it can be said that it is more than it was in the 1980s. With such a long profession, it has become an inevitable opportunities … or, if you are Scott, you are still happy opportunities because you refused. The person concerned? “Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines.”

It is known for years that Scott was one of the many managers into consideration to guide the three after James Cameron removed himself from the project. But in an interview with him recently GuardianHe revealed the amount of what was shown on the leadership of the film – a huge amount of $ 20 million, equal to what was appointed as the star of the Arnold Schwarznegger series.

“I am proud of this,” Scott told the Guardian newspaper. “Terminator” movies. “I have rejected a $ 20 (million) fee. Look, it cannot be bought, shouted. One of them said:” Ask what I get to me. “I thought:” I will try it. “

At that time, Scott was starting from one of his biggest career songs in “Gladiator”, and after putting “Silence of the Lambs” “Hannibal”, “Black Hawk Download” released in 2002. “Terminator 3” has ended to go to Jonathan Mostow, but it is interesting to think about the Scott version From the Sci-Fi he may look forward to.

Delivery of a creative movie to a different way out of the sequel is an honest proposal. When most film lovers talk about successful examples, “Alien” and “foreigners” tend to jump to the top of the list. Although Ridley Scott of 1979 is very different from the most directing heavy continuation directed by James Cameron, both of them did a great job to build a fictional universe that is still strong today with films such as “Alien: Romulus” The TV series FX “Alien: Earth.”

If Scott was at the Terminator 3 guidance tasks, he would have done exactly the same for Cameron, who Cameron did in the eighties. This could have meant that two of the largest science fiction privileges in the era were both formed through cooperative efforts from the same legendary managers. Perhaps this was just a synergy for the small world of science fiction in Hollywood.

Although Oeuvre’s Ridley Scott is incredibly varied, it always brings a strong orientation vision for both his songs and his messing. “Terminator 3” is far from the disaster, but it was also largely forgotten in the concession. The worst quality is that it is completely forgotten, and it lacks unforgettable moments or strong options that made the first two classic Cameron.

Certainly this was not a problem with Scott behind the camera, although it is also possible to provide a different kind of movies – one with more objective and less focused on work pieces. “This is nothing,” Scott told the Guardian newspaper regarding “Terminator 3” and this pattern of popcorn films. “It is like doing a Bond movie. Jawhar Bond movie is fun and camp. Terminator is a pure comedy tape.” Instead of following up in this template and trying to provide something light and cheerful, the director said that he may have delivered more than the ground.

“I will try to make it real,” he said. “That is why they have never asked me to make a Bond movie, because I can deal with that.”