Why was the details of Kamala Harris’s secret service?

Photo of author

By [email protected]


Pernd Dibsman Junior, at the White House

Getty Images Kamala Harris in a platform with three secret service agents in the background during a trip to Zambia in 2023. Gety pictures

Unlike previous presidents, the presidents do not guarantee protection for the rest of their lives.

President Donald Trump A former deputy abolishedDetails of the secret service of President Kamala HarrisSeven months after she left his post after her unclean presidential campaign.

Under the law, the US Secret Service provides former deputies and their families within six months of protection after their conditions ended.

However, this term can be extended, which was said to have been former President Joe Biden before leaving his post.

This step has already caused controversy, as California Governor Gavin New Zoom and the mayor of Los Angeles Karen Pass described it as political motives.

This is what we know.

Why Biden provided her security?

Until now, Biden or Harris commented on the reasons for extending her security after the six months assigned. CNN NN Biden said for one year for one year under the direction that was not previously disclosed before leaving the office.

From a legal perspective, Biden was among his rights to do so.

According to a law in 2008, the secret service can provide protection for former deputies and their husbands and any children under the age of 16 after leaving his post.

While the law states that protection should not extend for more than six months, the Minister of Internal Security has the authority to request “temporary protection” in situations that “information or conditions guarantee this protection.”

“If you put political effects aside, this is just a standard practice,” told BBC.

Is Harris face enhanced risks?

The sources familiar with the current situation CBS, the BBC, have told the recent threat assessment that nothing was concerned about the expansion of Harris’s security arrangements.

But some of the Harris team are concerned that as a woman and a colored person to be a vice president and as a candidate in the emotionally charged elections, she faced additional threats.

A number of threats against Harris were announced during her position in office and as a presidential candidate in 2024.

Many men were arrested and charged with threats online against her in 2024, for example, and in 2021, a woman from Florida acknowledged that she was guilty of providing threats against Harris and admitted that she had sent videos to her imprisoned husband in which firearms were shown and said that a “blow” could be carried out within 50 days.

In March, after Harris left his post, a man from Florida was also arrested after threatening to kill her with a sniper rifle.

However, Mr. Kisler said, compared to other politicians Harris, “it didn’t raise it as much as I could say.”

“I think it is a proper judgment by the secret service,” he added.

Removing Harris details a few weeks before the start of a multi -city tour to promote her book, 107 days, focused on her short -term presidential presentation.

According to Mr. Kisler, such a process will actually stretch and unlimited secret service. In September, the agency is also responsible for job figures and deception at the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

“This will require, perhaps dozens of secret service vehicles throughout the country, to follow its big tour,” he added. “This is a great depletion of the service.”

What are the security elements that are taken away?

The protection of the secret service extends beyond the agents who lead protection, protect them and their direct family.

In addition, the secret service is assigned to secure homes, such as Harris stay in Los Angeles, including the installation of safety and warning systems. The agents define proactively and monitor potential threats, including those that are sent electronically or via social media.

It is not clear how much this protection cost, and the secret service did not spread this number.

Private security for well -known celebrities, celebrities and business leaders can easily reach millions of dollars annually, depending on the level of threats and protection required.

According to Meta, Meta paid more than 23 million dollars (17 million pounds) to Mark Zuckerberg in 2023, including 9.4 million dollars in direct security costs.

Is this political revenge from Trump?

After announcing the details of Harris, some of Trump’s political allies and critics described this step immediately as a political motive by the president.

Trump has already removed the protection of the secret service of the allies and former enemies alike, including Hunter and Ashley Biden, the children of the former president; Intoni Fushi, former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Many TROMP officials and their former allies, including the names of the former country, Mike Bombo and John Bolton, former national security adviser who became an audio critic.

“The safety of our public officials should not be subject to the wrong, wrong political batch,” Bob Salladai, a spokesman for California Governor Gavin New Zeroum, told CNN.

Mr. Kisler said that the unwanted secret service is probably re -focusing its efforts on more immediate threats, such as those facing Trump and members of his administration.

“Perhaps President Trump was boiling to do this,” he said. “But there are real sound process.”

It is believed that Dick Cheney, another former vice president, Dick Cheney, has been extended to the protection of the secret service after the office left, by President Barack Obama at the time.

Are the rules different for former presidents?

Unlike the former deputies, those who served as a president have lifetime security, unless they choose not to do so.

In 1994 – to save costs – Congress moved to reduce protection for the former president and their husbands after 10 years of leaving his post.

But in 2013, President Obama fell law again to protect life. Today, this applies to George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Obama and Biden.

It is known that only one president, Richard Nixon, chose to give up the security submitted in 1985.

At that time, members of his New York Times told the members of the New York Times that he did this to save the agency’s money.



https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/branded_news/a298/live/dc976a50-84f5-11f0-b599-154efb9f3687.jpg

Source link

Leave a Comment