The judge rejects the Women’s Women’s Club case

American boycott judge, Alan B., rejected. Johnson again a lawsuit against the University of Wyoming University against their organization Allow a biological man to join Their group, which ruled last week that our organization could determine “women” as they choose.

the previous Kapa Gamma coat The members ’issue was rejected for the second time, this time with bias, after Johnson ruled, the separation of the University of Wyoming did not violate any rules by allowing the transgender student Artemis Langford to join 2022.

He has to ruleJohnson wrote that the organization clearly showed in the documents that it “determines women according to their sex, not” their biological race. ”

Johnson wrote: “Nothing in the permanent regulations or rules requires Kapa to define the words of” women “or” women “in a narrow way to include only individuals born in a specific group of reproductive organs, especially even when the dictionary mentioned by the prosecutors provides a more expansive definition,” Johnson wrote.

Our biological male organization allowed joining. We sue women’s rights

He also refused the martyrdom of former students by defining “women” under the president Donald Trump commanded the executive executive In January, “senior … human female”, adding that he did not even understand what this description means.

Johnson wrote: “We are not absolutely sure of what this definition means, and not a certificate in biology,” Johnson wrote. “But even if the assumption of this definition is in line with the plaintiffs, it only applies to the interpretation of the executive branch of federal laws and management policy. It is not related to the world of private contracts, where we find ourselves now.”

He added that the court is not allowed to interfere in the decisions of the organization unless it has broken its regulations or the committed fraud.

“In short, we are required to leave Kaba alone,” Johnson wrote.

Johnson’s dismissal of the case with bias means that it is no longer possible to make the same allegations to the court. However, the plaintiffs can still submit an appeal.

Fox News digital I arrived in Kaba Kaba Gama for comment.

“He has no role in determining the membership of a women’s club” and did not participate in the lawsuit, “Wyoming University spokesman told Fox News Digital.

The Court of Appeal hears the lawsuit of the University of Wyoming against a women’s club to allow

Johnson had rejected the case before Without bias in 2023 after he ruled that the chapter at Wyoming University did not violate his regulations because they did not clearly specify the word “woman”.

“The vote of the University of Wyoming University for recognition – and on a larger scale, a women’s club for hundreds of thousands accredited – Langford. With the beginning of the investigation and completion there, the court will not determine” women “today. The judge said,” The restricted definition injection that urges prosecutors. ”

Click here to get the Fox News app

In their original complaints, the former students claimed that Langford did not only make any effort to look like a woman after joining our organization, but it will also lead “Al -Mutlasa” Watch women In intimate situations. The complaint described one scenario where Langford was “clear erection” while watching our organization’s members.

Langford denied the last alleged incident, According to the Washington PostWhich added the court records strengthened Langford’s claim due to the testimony of the sister of another women’s club, confirming this account.