Perez Hilton Blake Livley speaks to call before the court date

The explosive dispute between the actress Blake Blake And the director Justin Balouni On their movie “It End with us”, he took another horrific turn. What started as a creative coincidence that has risen to one of the most legal wars in Hollywood, which is now a celebrity blogger Perez Hilton Directly in the spotlight of the courtroom. This Thursday, August 28, the Federal Federal Court in Las Vegas will hear arguments about a summons issued to Perez Hilton, born Mario Lavandira Junior, demanding the delivery of private communications and work related to his coverage of the case.

Lively Legal team claims that Hilton has published more than 500 negative pieces of it, as many use sarcastic titles, while standing with Baldoni. The actress claims that Hilton reports are suitable for an “unknown mutilation campaign” that she has been organized by her ex -star.

But Perez Hilton insists that he did not make any mistake, and that Levli’s summons is a skipping that could have the consequences of chilling for journalists all over the country.

Before his date on August 28, Hilton told The Blast exclusively that he was initially believed that the summons would be “fun” because he “loves attention” and believes that the law was next to it. But the reality soon is in.

“Now that this has lasted for more than five weeks, I can reveal that I was painful,” Hilton admitted. “This was a distraction from my work and my life. It took me away from my children and I am really consumed. I can’t stop thinking about everything. Even in the bathroom!”

Hilton represents that he represents himself without a lawyer, that he poured dozens of hours in preparing for a session on Thursday. “I am in the era of Eli Woods. I feel that Kim Kardashian is studying to become a lawyer,” he said jokingly, adding that hiring his high -price legal team had already cost him more than $ 50,000.

Perez Hilton argues that the summons is very large, and it reaches a return to May 2024, and that he is trying to force him to reveal secret sources, which says that both federal “shield laws” and Nevada aim to protect.

“This is not only about me,” he confirmed. “This can affect journalists all over the country, especially since more traditional media and only go digitally. Blake Levli argues that I am not a journalist because I am not with a television network or a TV network. This is ridiculous.”

Hilton believes that Levli’s actions exceed his position. “Blake Levli strongly faced critics, not just me. I have issued memoirs of more than 107 creators,” he said.

According to Perez Hilton, the actress sees anyone who doubts her listening as part of a coordinated distortion campaign. However, he insists that his reports were based only on the documents and evidence submitted in the court, not on the points of conversation or incentives from a blogging camp.

“I think it is illogical to think I will need to be encouraged to cover this story,” Hilton explained. “I did all this on my own, based on the behavior of Blake and her stadiums. I think much that she was doing in 2025 was to control the damage. I thought the audience would be beside her. But it seems that the audience is fully calling for Justin’s blog support. It is not stolen.”

When asked why this battle escalated to such maximum letters, Hilton believes that it is related to the film and more about public perception.

“Blake Levli had not raised this litigation if Justin agreed to the blogger to express the statement she and Ryan Reynolds wrote to release him. But he refused,” Hilton told Hilton.

The blogger pointed out that the billionaire Baldoni partner, Steve Sarwitz, was leading the legal bills of the director and Wayfarer studios, while Lively and Reynolds had huge resources.

“Both sides are interested in the truth as they see it, but with the same amount of general perceptions,” Hilton said. “I think there is still a high possibility that settles before the trial in 2026, just like FKA Twigs and the Shiite case of Labov. But at the present time, Justin has already won the Public Court of Opinion.”

However, Perez Hilton noticed that the jury’s vitality’s ruling could be catastrophic in her career. “If the jury decides that there is no harassment, it is distorting the facts, it will be more harmful than it has already happened.”