“Harry Potter” director breaks silence on JK Rowling controversy

Chris Columbus, the director who brought the world of magicians to life on the big screen, speaks frankly about his past. “Harry PotterAnd about JK RollingDistinguished views.

Although Columbus does not have plans to return to the upcoming HBO restarting, its reflections on movies, the future of concession, and Rollling’s comments reveal both pride and sadness.

Columbus explained that his time in Hugors is firmly in the past.

Senior director of the two films “Harry Potter” and producer of the third says he is not interested in reconsidering the epic, even as HBO advanced forward with its very expected restarting.

“No, I did that, I saw my novel,” he said diverse While he is in London to promote the Netflix Killing Club. “I have nothing left for me in the world of Potter.”

Despite the distance, Columbus is far from the bitterness of the television project. In fact, it welcomes it, especially since the format of the small screen will allow the details of the original films that you should cut.

He said, “The great thing about it is that with the first and second book, and the third, we wanted to do everything. We wanted to bring all of this on the screen, and we did not have the opportunity.”

Columbus cited the Polytertist Fils, absent from the films, as well as a tense dose scene that included Harry and Hermion, which has never ended on the screen.

“We could not enter this amazing scene in the movie, and I am sure that it will be in the HBO series. So for me, it is an opportunity to bring all these scenes to life,” he said.

The Rearcraction of Columbus gave a surreal moment of nostalgia.

“Because it was exactly where we were 20 years ago!” He said, recalling an exchange of shooting with Daniel Radcliffe and Martin Baifeld standing on Ruby Coulterran.

Columbus has always felt proud of Radcliffe’s journey. He said that the lessons learned in the “Al -House alone”, especially the need to protect young actors from sudden fame, affected how he and producer David Heman approached the actors “Harry Potter”.

Columbus explained that after his experience in “Al -House alone”, he and producer David Heman made a priority in “Harry Potter” to focus on throwing only young actors, but also ensuring their parents’ readiness to reveal lights.

With the eyes of the world on Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Ruert Grint, Columbus is attributed to the support of their “wonderful fathers” to help them move fame and grow well despite the tremendous pressure.

This pride grew only when Radcliffe got a recognition in Broadway.

“There is a feeling of pride in seeing Daniel Radcliffe wins the Tony Prize. It was great. His vision was on stage and seeing his incredibly talent as a musical comedian who was moving very to me,” said Columbus.

While he is proud of his memories “Harry Potter”, Columbus was not ashamed of processing the JK Rowling data, which was strongly criticized for the transit identity.

The director expressed his grief over the author’s division position, focusing on the importance of separating art from the artist.

“Sometimes I love separating the artist from art, I think it is important to do,” he said. “It is unfortunate, what happened. I definitely do not agree with what you are talking about. But it is very sad, it is very sad.”

Not Chris Columbus is the only one connected to the “Harry Potter” privilege who commented on Rolling’s comments.

The controversy surrounding her position on her sexual identity was deeply deepened after Harry Potter Shun Beegrestave publicly condemned her celebration of the UK Supreme Court virtue of the United Kingdom, which was denied the legal recognition of women.

Rolling posted a $ 150 million yacht photo, carrying a drink and cigars, which has been criticized. When she was accused of sharp smoking, she rose back, confirming that she was “objectively, in objective, and successive cigar.”

Biggerstaff againSaying intolerance may erode Rolling’s blood, and even inflated a viral function that compares its cigar screen with the Andrew Tate look.

The actor went further, accusing Rolling of funding campaigns “obsessed billionaire” against transit rights, on the pretext that most Scottish women did not support their position.

He expressed his support for transgender women, and criticized those who use women’s rights as a cover for reactionary policy.