Trump signs a matter that prohibits the burning of science-the right of the American constitution reserve

Photo of author

By [email protected]


On Monday, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order asking the Ministry of Justice to investigate and try people for burning the American flag, which was the activity spent by the US Supreme Court is the legitimate legitimate political expression under the American constitution.

The signed order in the Oval Office admitted that the court ruling 5-4 in a case of Texas in 1989, but he said that there is still room to prosecute the burning of science if it is likely to incite an imminent procedure without law “or rise to” fighting words. “

“You burn the flag, you will get one year in prison. Don’t get 10 years, don’t get one month,” Trump said. “You can get one year in prison, pass in your record, and you will see the burning of the flag immediately.”

He also called on the American Prosecutor Bam Bondi to follow up the litigation to challenge the ruling of 1989, an attempt by Trump to restore the case before the Supreme Court. Today, the Supreme Court is more conservative than the court’s makeup in 1989 and includes three judges who were appointed Trump in his first term.

Defenders of civil freedoms and constitutional scientists questioned both legitimacy and the benefit of Trump’s work. A lawyer working in the Freedom of Expression Heat Organization said that Trump has no ability to rewrite the first amendment.

“While people can be tried because of the burning of anything in a place where they are not allowed to set fires, the government cannot sue prototypes-even if many Americans, including the president, are” unique and provocative. “

Watch | The US President aims to burn science, the policy of sponsorship on executive orders:

Trump signs the executive order targeting the guarantee, science burns

On Monday, US President Donald Trump signed two other executives targeting the sponsorship policy and burning science. Trump also threatened to send the National Guard to more major cities across the United States, noting an increase in crime and homelessness.

Professor says that any epidemic of burning science

In the 1989 case, the Supreme Court judges decreed 5-4 that the first amendment protects the burning of flag as a legal political expression. The late judge Antonin Skalia was the icon of the province that Trump has repeatedly praised, in the majority.

On Monday, Trump described the 1989 court behind the ruling as a “very sad court.”

The president said that burning the flag of the United States “incites riots at the levels that we have not seen before”, with “some” crazy “because of his situation in his situation and others express their anger at people to burn it. He did not provide examples.

A realistic newspaper of the White House refers to the recent protests, including in Los Angeles in June, where the flag was burned “in addition to violent works and other behavior that threatens public safety.”

“Throughout the country, they burned flags. Worldwide, they burn the American flag,” said Trump, while Bonde, and other officials behind him.

GS Hans, a law professor at Cornell University, which focuses on the first amendment, said the country did not suffer from a “settlement from burning science.”

“I don’t think this was something that was a big problem,” Hans said in an interview. “It is a solution for a problem.”

A pile of red, white and blue flags burns
The flags of the United States are burning during the protest of blacks in New York City on July 4, 2020. (Andrew Kelly/Reuters)

“Uniquely offensive and provocative”

The executive matter states that the desecration of the American flag is “a unique offensive and provocative. It is a statement of contempt, hostility and violence against our nation – the clearest expression of the opposition to the political union that preserves our rights, freedom and security. This representation of America may burn violence and leadership.”

The public prosecutor calls for the priorities of enforcement to “to the maximum extent possible” for criminal and civil laws against burning science that causes harmless harm to ensuring the freedom of the first amendment.

“Thank you for protecting the American flag, and we will do so without passing the first amendment as well,” Bondi told the president.

Watch | Trump says that the demonstrators suffer from the day of science to complete with them a “very heavy force”:

Trump says that the demonstrators suffer from the day of science to complete with them a “very heavy force” with them

US President Donald Trump told the correspondents on Tuesday that he “does not even” know “about the protest, referring to the” No Kings “demonstrations planned throughout the country.

Foreign citizens may face their visas, residence permits, naturalization procedures and other immigration advantages, according to the arrangement. It can also be deported.

The burning of science was in Trump’s minds for years.

After his election as president for the first time in November 2016, Trump said that “there should be consequences” for anyone who burns the American flag, such as imprisonment or loss of citizenship.

“No one should be allowed to burn the American flag – if they do so, there should be consequences – perhaps the loss of citizenship or a year in prison!” Trump wrote what was then Twitter.

The US constitution prevents the government from stripping citizenship from naturally born Americans.



https://i.cbc.ca/1.7617630.1756165650!/fileImage/httpImage/image.JPG_gen/derivatives/16x9_1180/global-race-protests-california.JPG?im=Resize%3D620

Source link

Leave a Comment