The original dark end of weapons has been changed due to the test fans

This article contains Spoilers For “weapons”.

“Weapons” Zak Kurgger It is a sense of goodwill to the box office, and it is great news for anyone who appreciates the original films that indicate the importance of sincere production. Along with “Sin” “Sin” Ryan Kogler, Adult demographic indicates that studios leave money on the table by training their focus on seizing cash with four worst built around superheroes or other IP. There is a generation that would like to go to cinemas; If you use a great talent and taste the hook properly, they will return to Multiplex.

Although I ease my enthusiasm at the present time (if only because two of the original original copies that flounder at the box office can quickly lead to executives who breathe from the risks to excessive identification of tried and real brands), I taste these films and hope for the best. This is difficult because I grew up in the 1980s, when you gained any movie that converts an elegant profit (or I found a huge follower in home entertainment) at least one supplement. These were not carefully developed! We were cheaply produced by Slasher and Sex Comedy Sequels, we have been subjected to such “Smash-AD-Grabs” like “MORK MURNER 2”, “Arthur 2: On The Rocks,” Crocodile Dundee 2 “,” RAMBO III “and” Poltergest III and “CaddyShack II”-and they were all released in the same summer! The studios have always been in hedge from their bets.

When the studios do not tend to present in advance, they often focus heavily on the results of the test examination. Sometimes, they manipulate the game to bypass a non -laboratory output that is dug in their wake. I personally saw this coming down yet Riot examination for “bad Santa”. This is a story for another period. Anyway, According to the oppositeCregger seems to have a few disorders examined the test when he examined his first pieces of “weapons”. Did he make the right call?

Once the Glades talisman is broken on its victims, “weapons” exploded to Pradum. Children tear them, and it seems that the world has been restored. But the closing narration tells a different story – and this narration is only present because the test test of testing tests needs to be closed specifically.

As Kerber Ajisi told, “Originally, this audio comment that comes in the end there was not even there. I wasn’t really in this idea. I wanted to finish a look (Matthew). This was not the worst problem in the world. Cregger Ajsi told,“ People loved the movie, but they were all like, “this could not be the end.”

This is one of those rare cases in which I don’t think the end of the test affected by the test of a great movie. More than 40 years ago, the fans demanded a happier end to Joel Godman from Tom Cruise in “risky works”, but the medium solution, which Joel found Princeton, although his interview that occurred in a prostitution house was a dark victory. This, we understand, is how the world works, and Joel will flourish in this miserable environment, which is driven for operation (and mode).

By informing the public that Alex’s parents have never recovered, and most children are still almost troubled, we have left more wreckage of redemption. It is strange for me that Cregger wanted to cut the movie without a final novel (i.e. We do not reach Paul Thomas Anderson “Magnolia”, “,” Cregger cents a tremendous effect on “weapons”); This is an arranged movie that requires a meaningful cancellation. The idea that there is no return to normal for these children or their families, even after the death of the witch, the rings are correct in our time.