Layl Mindez denied the conditional release 36 years after the death of the parents

Liel Mindez Conditional release has been rejected after more than three decades 1989 his parents were killed Jose and Kitty Mainndes At Beverly Hills.

The decision was taken on Friday, August 22, after the Lyle’s Parole session, which was attended by the convicted killer through the video conference from the Richard J. Donovan Correctional in San Diego.

The decision comes after only one day Night’s brother Eric, 54, the conditional release, which is in prison, was rejected by the same killing.

Lael, 57, faced a different committee of the conditional release commissioner to his brother in the 10 -hour hearing, where his disobedience was examined in prison, including his illegal use of the phone and his reprimanding a visiting touch in several cases. Lael was illegal possession of the phone while imprisoning 2018 to 2024.

Likewise, during the Eric session, his behavior was completely considered in prison. The main conditional release commissioner Robert Barton was martyred with various prison violations while Eric was imprisoned, including inappropriate behavior with visitors, drug smuggling, abuse of government computers, violent rings in 1997 and 2011 and possession of mobile phones, for each. Newsnation.

The Manendez family issued a statement after the decision, to each NBC Los Angeles.

“This is not the end of the road,” the family statement said. “Meanwhile, we know that they will take time to think about the recommendations of the Board of Directors and will continue to lead, direct and build programs that support rehabilitation and hope for others.”

The statement continued, “We know that they are good men who have worked to rehabilitate and regret them. We love them unconditionally and we will continue to stand by the journey forward.”

the next Eric session, The family also issued a statement prepared, obtained by Newsnation Thursday

“While we respect the decision, the result of today was of course disappointing and not what we were hoping,” said the members of the Mindez family in the statement. “But our belief in Arik is still fixed and we know that it will take the council’s recommendation in a step. His regret, growth, and the positive impact that he had on others talking about themselves. We will continue to stand by his side and adhere to the hope of returning to the house soon.”

Lael and Erik spend their rulings at the California Correctional Facility after their arrest in 1990, on charges of first -class killing. The siblings became dominant people after their father was found in their home.

The brothers eventually admitted to killing their fathers after years of alleged physical, emotional and sexual assault. Manendez brothers were convicted of first -class death and sentenced to life imprisonment without conditional release in 1996 after two prominent experiences.

After recovery in their case, Eric and Lile was resentful of 50 years of life, which made them eligible for a conditional release under the law of the young perpetrator in California since they committed their crime under the age of 26.

Before listening sessions, Nathan Hoshman, The current region’s lawyer in Los Angeles explained the reason for his presence against Eric and Layl.

“The Mindez brothers have never accepted the terrible murder of their parents, instead they continue to promote a false response to the self -defense that the jury rejected decades ago,” Hachman said in a statement on Wednesday, August 20. “We have constantly opposed their release because they did not show a complete insight into their crimes or showed that they have been completely rehabilitated, and thus continue to risk society. We will evaluate our final position based on the evidence presented in the session.”

The case was an inspiration for Many documentary films and filmsIncluding the 2024 version of Netflix documentary and series. Hashman insisted that this interest will not affect hearing results.

“While recent documentaries drew attention to this issue, conditional release decisions should only depend on facts and law.” “This issue must be seen, like all cases – especially cases that capture the audience – with a critical eye. Justice should not be affected by the scene.”