The Court of Appeal receives a civil fraud penalty worth $ 500 million

The Court of Appeals has a penalty of $ 500 million (372 million pounds), which ordered President Donald Trump to pay a civil dough in New York last year.

Judge Arthur Angelon Trump ordered to pay fees to amplify the value of Trump’s real estate on a large scale in order to obtain favorable loans.

In the long ruling issued on Thursday, the judges in the New York Supreme Court Appeals Department stated that although Trump was responsible for fraud, a fine of nearly half a billion dollars was excessive and is likely to violate constitutional protection against severe punishment.

In the case, Judge Angelon Trump ordered $ 355 million, but with interest, he grew to more than $ 500 million.

Judge Peter Multon wrote: “Although the damage has certainly happened, it is the Carmic damage that can justify nearly half a billion dollars to the state,” Judge Peter Multon wrote.

In a post on his social media website, Trump, Trump claimed that the decision was “a complete victory.”

“I am very respectful that the court has the courage to put this illegal and shameful decision that was harmful to business throughout New York,” he said. “It was a magician chase, in a commercial sense, unprecedented before.”

The New York Prosecutor’s Office, which led to the case against Trump, also set up the decision as a victory, as he supported the responsibility for fraud on Trump and the judges did not offered other unnoticed penalties. The office plans to appeal against the decision on the fine to the highest court court, the Court of Appeal.

In a statement, the Public Prosecutor’s Office said that the rulers “confirmed the well -backed discovery of the Court of trial: Donald Trump, his company, and two of his children responsible for fraud.”

She also said: “It should not be lost before history: Another court has ruled that the president violated the law, and that our issue has an advantage.”

In the case against Trump, his two sons prohibited the adults, and Trump, Judge Engelon, Trump, from working as a company manager or obtaining loans from banks in the state for a period of three years.

Thursday’s decision remained in place and other non -monetary penalties imposed by Judge England.

The 323 -page ruling, which included three long opinions, revealed a dispute between the five judges in the committee.

They were primarily divided into the advantages of the original lawsuit filed by James, who accused Trump and his sons of “continuous and repeated fraud.”

While many judges said it was “within its legal authority to lift this procedure,” one of them believed that the case should have been rejected and two said that there should be a new trial of a limited scope.

These two people also joined the decision to get rid of the fine “for the only goal of ensuring the final,” as Judge Multon wrote.

It is clear that the American voters “issued a ruling” on the Trump’s political profession, as Judge Multon wrote, and “this seat today unanimously deviates from the effort to destroy his work.”

The ruling came almost a year after the committee listens to the oral arguments on the appeal, as many judges seemed skeptical in the civil fraud case.

Ibn Trump, Eric Trump, who participated in the case, celebrated the decision in a post on social media.

“After 5 years of hell, justice prevailed!” books.

Will Thomas, Assistant Professor of Business Law at the University of Michigan, said the ruling was a “judicial copy of the kick of the box on the road.”

He said, “By accepting it, the courts of appeal punished the real legal decision before the New York Court of Appeal, noting that its unusual decision” was taken “for the only goal of ensuring the final.”

“It is difficult to take any conclusions of this … except that we will have to continue waiting for a longer period to find out the final result in James V, Trump.”

In September 2023, Judge Engelon spent that Trump was responsible for fraud in work, and he found that he had offended hundreds of millions of dollars. Another trial was held in 2024 to determine the punishment.

In one case, the judge found that Mr. Trump’s financial statements have mistakenly claimed that the Trump Tower was approximately three times his actual size.

Trump had said that the issue presented by James, a democratic, was of political motives.

Mark Zodler, a long -term appeal lawyer in New York, said the long sentence on Thursday also reflects the historical predicament on how to deal with a huge fraud case that includes a seated president.

“Do you have an opinion of 300 pages if this is the atmosphere of businessman, not Donald Trump?” He asked Mr. Zaderr.

Additional reports by Kayla Epstein