I have been a commercial reporter for nearly 30 years, a specialist in executives – great, medium, and really bad (sometimes in one person). From the early 1990s to the end of 2010, I installed a gun, and watched in the territory of the Zawiya office’s view – alpha at all – left politics and academy, and is essentially another perspective in dust.
The capitalist that the shareholders moved meant that what was good to work was good for everyone. (It was not supposed to mean “everyone” to hit the income inequality The highest historical levels). This belief, in turn, is the loud industry from Jimmy Damon and Mark Zuckerberg to Jack Wilsh and Varne Buffett as the strongest votes on this planet. The real decisions were made in Davos or in Sun Valley, not DC or Brussels. The policy was inconvenience. For decades – even like companies Microsoft and Google I became fine with the Anti-monopoly law-and it ignored Washington technology companies and was not even pressure. Why do you care?
With a decrease in confidence to institutions in general, but it rose to Corporate leadersEven social change movements were pushed forward by CEOs. Levi chief executives of the former Levi CEO Chip Bergh and Dick’s Sporting Goods spoke, Lauren Hobart in favor of topics such as The safety of the weapon or justice.
Other organizations, political groups and societies followed the leadership of companies – and it seems that they are working for work: less than five years ago, at the height of protests from the epidemic and protests on black life, Edelman Trust Barometer showed that employees of all generations were more than 7.0 to 9.5 times attracted to a company that takes a major position. Even if you did not agree with the policies, the point is that the executives knew they were Enable To make these decisions independently.
Quickly forward to this day. Since wealthy people become richer and evaluate the stock market is increasingly linked to a small group of companies giant, the leaders of these companies have more economic power than ever. However, they have lost their ability to be good and shocked to use it (except, of course, when they already join management, such as the good old Elon).
It will be funny if it is not very terrify Golden gifts – Welcome Tim Cook! -While they are curious and they are scratching to the President of the United States, “investments” of horse circulation in the United States of America, which have a small opportunity to embody in exchange for not imposing taxes or publicly insulting in a specific month. Unlike other organizations that have a limited crane – non -profit organizations and universities, and now, they want to think, Congress – these men already have influence of resistance. But no – or no – even as one of their own (Intel Lips CEO Tan) has threatened his work directly by the president, along with another. Nafidia Jensen Huang CEO, may soon register for a regular payment Vig To Uncle Sam.
Many leaders see this undoubtedly kissing tactic. Be nice, stay under the radar, and everything will be good one day soon. Then we can return to regularly scheduled capitalism. But this is not the way the leaders of companies in the United States behave that they have bent at the will, for the better or for the worse, because they are He was able.
If the executives actually unite, they can use this market force to pressure the president and his team to move from their chaotic and arbitrary approach to the management of the economy, at least merges rational thinking.
So what can these executives do, instead of compliment and insult? They can work together instead of leaving their strong strength.
They can use their voices collectively – just as they did several times before in times of trouble. Only last year (before the elections), Jpmorgan Chase CEO Jimmy Damon spoke publicly Inequality in income. Last April, when the tariffs were threatened, the commercial round table talked – had an impact. But now after the definitions have become real … cockroaches.
They can say – loudly and the world as a group – that the launch of a non -party analyst responsible for the financial statements of the nation will make it impossible for anyone to trust that anything that businessmen say is correct.
They can say that businessmen are better at work than politicians (even if these politicians also run work at the same time) and that councils and shareholders have already a credit duty to do the right thing.
They can talk about how this chaotic tariff cycle makes it impossible to budget, plan or employ when they have no idea of their costs, and as a result, many of their financial expectations are no longer intact.
They can tend to their strength instead of abandoning it.
They can try to cooperate – so as not to lose the ability to compete.
After all, as a famous author once said, they only lose their chains.
The opinions expressed in cutting comments Fortune.com are only the opinions of their authors and do not necessarily reflect opinions and beliefs luck.
https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/GettyImages-2228841996-e1755635381897.jpg?resize=1200,600
Source link