The only reason for the animation went further on the fixed Jindy Tartakovsky (exclusively)

Photo of author

By [email protected]






Critical reception for the animation legend The new Genndy Tartakovsky feature, “fixed”, “,” Certainly mixed, but if there is one thing that everyone agrees, it is that the two -dimensional animation is really enormous. Netflix had a general hell in the animated section, with “KPOP Demon Hunters” became a sensation in the scheme The early tinnitus surrounding the upcoming version “in your dreams” proves that the flowing tyrant has become a legitimate competitor in the animation space. As a creator for the leading series such as “Dexter’s Laboratory and” Samurai Jack “and His great work, “primitive” Tartakovsky is a kind of creativity that must be delivered to empty checks to do everything it wants – even if it is a movie that includes modern dogs and about 100 jokes on the testes. When it comes to animation patterns, everything really did, and when it came to “fixed”, he knew that the story needed a familiar classic appearance.

As he told me during our interview with PodCast /Film Weekly PodCast, “The story requires a certain style of animation, right? Remembering “fixed” animation of the cartoons that made many people fall in love with the middle in the first place. “He is a much more associated with me than Disney, without pollution or anything,” says Jindy. “It is the TEX AVEY/Warner Broths style without the big Googly eyes.” The pattern adds a little sabotage to the film, which changes the vulgar with a feeling of nostalgia.

But this is not only the “fixed” pattern that deserves to be highlighted, but implement. Even with a relatively low budget for an animated feature film, “fixed” is moved at a level usually dedicated to theatrical versions. According to Tartakovsky, the animation made this level because they were excited about it. After only years of working in CGI or children’s fee, the opportunity to work on something in 2D and only adults made them more enthusiastic.

The animation wanted to fix each other

Jindy Tartakovsky said he had a list of the people he loved and wanted to work in the movie, and that he had finished employing about 80 % of that list. “I never thought that we would reach this level because we are low budget (…) but suddenly they started moving it, as is the case at the theatrical level, then they started seeing each other’s scenes and began to follow each other,” says Tartakovsky. “They are like,” Wow, this person does that (so) I will push myself more to do this better, and then suddenly, we got this amazing quality of the animation. Humor has strengthened, she gave this amazing classic style nostalgia but with these contemporary and subject stories, it made them a very unique thing. “

This is not. only The two -dimensional animation has become increasingly rare in the feature of the feature film. Despite the truth The animation is not only for childrenThe family’s friendly fare is definitely strangling the middle. In the sense that the majority of animation spend most of their days moving entertainment for children (The necessity, for the record!). Getting an opportunity to work on something for adults, even if that means that the moving dogs that do it “in the human style”, was met with passionate excitement. “They were like the animation of” Roger Rabit “, and former museum fees, Disney, and they just exploded because they were never able to work on this type of topic,” says Tartakovsky. “So they were like,” stand, I can get this, “and they just went for it.”

They went for that, and they can see the results in “Thabet”, now flowing on Netflix. To hear our full interview with Genndy Tartakovsky, check the latest episode of Weekly:





Source link

https://www.slashfilm.com/img/gallery/the-one-reason-animators-went-above-and-beyond-on-genndy-tartakovskys-fixed-exclusive/l-intro-1755197282.jpg

Leave a Comment