Andrew Komo calls on his opponent in the New York City mayor’s race, Zahran Mamdani, mixing his stable apartment in his rent, while paying a long proposal that would prevent other middle -class tenants from reaching a large part of the city’s housing.
“I invite you to come out immediately,” Kumo wrote in A. Social media post by width on a large scale At the end of this week, Mamdani throws a “very wealthy person” occupying an apartment that a homeless family can use.
The offensive line led to tens of millions of views online and revived a long discussion about who should get access to stability units in New York, which constitute approximately 40 % of the city’s rental shares and is currently open to people from all income.
He also explained the rhetorical lengths that Komo wants to go as he escalates in an independent attempt by the mayor against Mamdani, the democratic socialism that Easily defeat him In the democratic introductory elections on a platform focused on the ability to bear the costs and freezing rent on the stable units.
Mamdani, who earns 143,000 dollars annually as a state legislator, said that he pays $ 2,300 per month for one apartment from one bedroom in Queens sharing her with his wife-a living situation called Komo “disgusting”.
On the contrary, Komo, millions of millions who previously served as the governor of the state, spends nearly $ 8,000 per month on an apartment in central Manhattan who moved to last year from Wimschest, a wealthy suburb.
In recent weeks, 67 -year -old Komo has adopted a more aggressive presence on social media, and he got both praise and ridicule for his use Millennium online generation And the references repeated to the “concession of his opponent”. Mamdani’s mother is a successful independent film director and his father is a professor at the University of Colombia.
On Monday, Komo went a step forward, as he issued an official proposal, called “Zahran Law”, preventing owners from renting vacant rental units to “wealthy tenants”, who know that they are paying less than 30 % of their income towards the current rent.
The rental program, which is associated with the number of owners that the rent can be raised every year, does not include about a million apartments, currently any income restrictions – which opponents have long have prompted to change.
While the average stable rent in the family gets $ 60,000 annually, it is not uncommon for New York residents with medium or high income in the units, which sometimes rent for several thousand dollars per month.
But the idea of Komo attracted rapid doubts from some housing experts, who indicated that the maximum, by definition, means that all the new tenants of the unitary units are leased will abandon a large part of their income.
“The idea that we only have to have people living in apartments that they cannot tolerate, it seems that they put people for failure,” said Ellen Davidson, a lawyer at the Legal Assistance Association. “It is not a suggestion from someone who knows anything about the housing market or New York City.”
The New York Real Estate Board, the owner of the owner whose members supported its members with an overwhelming majority in the preliminary elections, did not respond to investigating whether they support the proposal. But in an email, the group’s president, James Willian, said that “the benefits of regulating rent are not well targeted” and that a form of testing should be considered.
Under the state law, long -distance walking is determined on the units stable by a council, not angel.
Davidson, a housing lawyer, said: “The stability of the rent has never been tested because it is not a reasonable housing program. It is a program on the stability of the neighborhood.”
“You should not benefit from the two wealthy and distinguished people from a program aimed at the employee employee residents assistant,” Rich Azobardi, the official spokesman for the Como campaign, said in a text message, adding that the income threshold standards will fall under the same system that governs other programs in low -income housing.
The spokesman for Mamdani, the role of Picke, said the proposal proved that Komo was desperate and far.
She added: “While Komo only cares about the luxury of Republican donors, Zahran believes that the city government’s mission is to guarantee the life of dignity, and not to determine who deserves one.”
https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AP25224651274353-e1755039009231.jpg?resize=1200,600
Source link