Craig Barrett, former CEO CRAIG Barrett CEO, Rescue Plan for Intel and Advanced Chips in America

2. No Samsung Or TSMC plans to bring its latest manufacturing to the United States in the short term.

3. American clients love Nafidiaand appleand GoogleAnd so on, they should understand that they need a second source to manufacture their leading products due to prices, geographical stability, and the safety of the supply line.

4. Intel is poor money and cannot invest in the necessary capacity in the future to replace TSMC or even a reasonable part of the TSMC capacity. They may need a cash pump of $ 40 billion or so to be able to compete. Realistically, the investment is 100 % of capital granting in the chips law, so USG is unlikely to be the savior.

5. The only place from which money can come is customers. They are all rich cash, and if 8 of them are ready to invest $ 5 billion, INTEL will have an opportunity.

6 CCEO of Urrent IntelComments about Not investing in new technology (14A) Even subscription is a joke. To win this space, you should be a pioneer in technology, not dependent. It takes several years to create one of these technologies and no customer wants to subscribe to something that is the best.

7. Fortunately, Intel has a good technology to work with (High Na Euv, back power, etc.) so that they have a realistic driving shot if they invest now. They just need money.

8. Where does the money come from? Customers invest for a piece of Intel and combating the offer. Why should he invest? Local supply, second source, national security, influence in negotiating with TSMC, etc., and if USG collects its work together, it stimulates the procedure through a 50 % tariff (or any Tram number) on the latest imports. If we can support local and aluminum steel, then we can certainly support the semiconductors.

9. FFWBMS (four former members of the Board of Directors) continues in Intel, claim You should divide Intel into two pieces Before any customer invests in Intel. Be serious. There are many interactions of the company that involve both the offer and the competition. It is also very difficult to imagine Antlel really competing with the likes of NVIDIA, Apple, DeadGoogle, Dell, etc. in established production lines. In any way, if you want to complicate the problem, it takes enough time to divide the Intel and make FFWBMS happy but if you are working in the field of providing Intel and its basic manufacturing strength for the United States of America, then solving the real problem – immediate investment in Intel, complexes, national security, etc.

10. Potus and DOC can set the stage, and customers can make the necessary investments, and the Intel Council can finally do something positive for the company, and we stop writing the opinion of opinion on this topic.

The views expressed in the Fortune.com comments are only the opinions of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of wealth.

Read more covering the Intel crisis:

How I Incony Intel fell into a 20 -year decrease

The day after Trump’s invitation, Trump invites Intel president “conflicting”, former managers invite a new company, a new council and a new executive director

Trump accuses the CEO of Intel of being “very conflicting”, which requires resignation as Tom Coton highlights the reporting in China’s relations.

Submit 2025 Fortune Global 500The final ranking of the largest companies in the world. Explore this year’s list.