In Kentucky, a “city hall” province conducted a month with approximately 8,000 residents to attend earlier this year, thanks to artificial intelligence technology.
Bolling Green, the third largest city in Kentucky and part of Warren Province, is facing a large increase in population by 2050. To expand the city in preparation for this, boycotting officials wanted to integrate society inputs.
Community communication is a difficult work: the city’s halls, while the employee is widely, does not tend to collect a large crowd, and when people come, it is a group of people who have strong negative opinions only and not to represent the city in general.
On the other hand, collecting the opinion of a larger part of the city via online polls will lead to a large group of data so much that officials and volunteers will face difficulty in combing and understanding it.
Instead, Bolling Green boycott officials have done Amnesty International. Participation was huge: in an online survey for a period of about a month, about 10 % of the Green Bowling population expressed their opinions on the policy changes they wanted to see in their city. Then the results were manufactured by the Amnesty International tool and made it in a political report, still visible to the public to see on Website.
“If I have a meeting in the city hall on these issues, 23 people appear.” PBS News Hour In an interview published this week. “What we just conducted was the largest municipal hall in America.”
Green bowling experience
The province got the help of a local strategic company to launch a website in February, where residents can provide unknown ideas. For the survey they used pol.isAn open source online polling platform is used all over the world for civil participation, and special success in particular in Taiwan.
The claim was open, just ask the participants what they wanted to see in their community over the next 25 years. They can then continue to participate more by voting on other answers.
Over the course of the 33 days, the website was accepting the answers, as about 8,000 population weighted more than a million times, and they shared about 4000 unique ideas calling for new museums, expanding the infantry infrastructure, green spaces and more.
Then the answers were assembled in a report using Sensemaker, an Amnesty International tool by Google Technology that analyzes large groups of online conversations, classifies what is said in general topics, analyzes the agreement and the dispute to create visions that can be implemented.
In the end, Sensemaker 2,370 found an idea that could agree on at least 80 % of the respondents. Some of the most agreements included increasing the amount of health care professionals in the city so that the residents do not have to rely on services an hour away in Nashville, retail the empty retail spaces and add more restaurants to the northern side of the city.
Online survey was able to reach people who could not boycott otherwise, such as politically separated or those who could not find time to work to attend the city halls.
Coordination was also better in accessing migrants by submitting multiple languages and then translating answers automatically. This was welcomed by people like Daniel Tarda, a migrant from Burkina Faso and a non -profit local founder who leads a football team of immigrants under the age of 18 and struggles to speak English.
“I knew that people wanted to be part of something. But if you don’t ask, you don’t know,” Tarda told PBS.
Volunteers are now collecting ideas from the report to provide concrete political recommendations to lead the province by the end of the year. According to a survey that Jigsaw conducted with local leaders, he saved artificial intelligence with an average of 28 working days.
An agreement outside the party lines
Jigsaw wrote in an article blog this year.
It was one of the most surprising things they discovered in Bolling Green was that when the ideas were unknown and stripped of political identity, voters found that they agreed to a lot.
“When most of us do not participate, people who usually do are the ones who have the strongest opinions, and perhaps the least overlooking information, more angry, and then begins to get a caricature of what the other side thinks and believes in.
Jigsaw announced this week that it is now participating with the Napolitan Institute, a public research organization and a review founded by the famous polling expert Scott Rasmussen, to collect information on how Americans from every region in the Congress of the Supreme Speeches of America, the country now, and its existence. Unlike the green experience of bowling, the goal is not a policy but to understand the place where the nation stands.
Amnesty International’s capabilities: good and bad
There are still concerns related to their nature with this experience with artificial intelligence in local rule. Although the Bowling Green reconnaissance website notes that “no personal information has been taken, and no demographic data has been stored”, this does not necessarily mean any future applications for this in another place you will follow.
Artificial intelligence is the subject of privacy concerns due to their exposure to data violations, which will become a problem if people will get their political beliefs that they made with confidence.
Artificial intelligence also has a problem with creators bias in its algorithm. Only last month, the researchers found that Elon Musk Groc You will consult Chatbot with controversial Musk opinions – before answering sensitive questions. If artificial intelligence to generate neutral policy suggestions, it will be a defect in this way.
But if these fears are adequately addressed, artificial intelligence can have the ability to completely revolutionize civil participation. It can show a way to overcome the past political polarization and towards a tangible change, similar to the way in which artificial intelligence has created an area of a society divided into green bowling to find its common land.
https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2025/03/PlatosGPT-1200×675.jpg
Source link