The United States is drifting from the allies because it ignores the Gaza plan in Israel

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that Israel intends to control all signs of the Gaza Strip on an escalation that fly in the face of some confirmed international warnings.

But that is, at least so far, the United States government has received a collective ignorance and ignorance.

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump said that the matter was “left to Israel” largely “whether he would fully occupy Gaza. When asked the next day about whether he was giving Israel a” green light “, he instead spoke about the American strikes on Iran earlier this year.

Washington’s ambassador to Israel Mike Hackabi was more direct – and his answer was that the Gaza Plan in Netanyahu was not a source of America’s concern.

“It is not our duty to tell them what they should or should not be done,” he said. “Certainly, if they ask for wisdom, lawyer and advice, I am sure that the president will present it. But in the end, the decision that the Israelis and the Sililers only can make.”

Netanyahu faced some opposition to his plan – especially from the Chief of Staff, Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir, according to the Israeli media, who argued against a widespread occupation.

In this event, a declaration after a meeting of the Security Council of Security Council in Israel has not said that Israel will control the entire lands of Gaza, but rather that it “will prepare to control Gaza City.”

However, I mentioned that one of the principles of ending the war is “Israeli security control in the Gaza Strip.”

Some have suggested that the full acquisition of Gaza was always on the table.

“Netanyahu was always planning to take over Gaza, and he was waiting for the right moment,” Amin Seikal, Fakhri Professor in the Middle East and Central Asian Studies at the Australian National University.

Netanyahu suggested that Israel does not want to keep the lands, but “handed it over to the Arab forces” – without specifying which.

Whatever the plan, the Trump administration does not give Netanyahu any public indicator as wrong.

This represents a noticeable change in the White House policy. Trump was previously more than he wanted to identify his views on the future of Gaza – even when Netanyahu and the Israelis caught.

In February, a few weeks after its second presidential term, he said that the United States can be deeply involved in rebuilding Gaza as a global resort, and they suggested moving the Palestinians outside the region.

While the United States joined Israel in attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities in the brief clash between the two countries in June, Trump publicly pressed and powerful on Israel to commit to the ceasefire that ended this conflict.

The Americans also expressed the misery of their Israeli attacks on Syria last month – which led to a public rejection, while providing more clear criticism.

“Bibi behaves like a crazy man,” a White House official told Axios. “It explodes everything all the time.”

The White House was also invested in ending the Gaza war, until Netanyahu was pressured for a ceasefire before Trump took office in January.

Steve Whitchov, a real estate pole with a wide diplomatic portfolio at the White House Trump, was the point of these negotiations, and seeks to mediate a permanent ceasefire with the release of the remaining hostages that Hamas took on October 7, 2023.

Recently, a month ago, the White House was optimistic that the deal was within reach.

“We hope that by the end of this week, we will have an agreement that will lead to a 60 -day ceasefire,” Witkeov said on July 8, adding that it may lead to “a permanent peace in Gaza.”

But after a little more than two weeks, the ceasefire had collapsed, and Witkev was accused of Hamas of being selfish and not acting in good faith.

“Hamas did not really want a deal,” Trump said on July 25. “I think they want death, and it is very bad.”

Trump’s comments – and his decision to abandon the talks with Hamas and survival can be contradictory about what could represent a huge new Israeli military operation – a trick designed to force the Palestinian group to make new concessions at the negotiating table.

If so, this will be clear enough.

“The Trump administration has obtained a lot of influence,” said Professor Seikal of the Australian National University. “I think Netanyahu will not take this step unless he has a kind of approval or implicit support from Washington.”

However, this American change in the training course from the general rejection to the clear departure can be part of an effort by the president to return to his unjust view – a position that he temporarily abandoned during Iranian strikes, which greatly increases the atom of parts of his political base.

“A special envoy for Israeli and Palestinian negotiations during the Barack Obama administration,” Frank Lenchetein, a special envoy for Israeli and Palestinian negotiations during the Barack Obama administration, said Frank Linstein, a special envoy for Israeli and Palestinian negotiations during the Barack Obama administration, ”

“But at the present time, anyway, I think Trump will allow Netanyahu to do what he wants.”

If so, Trump’s position stands in a flagrant contradiction with the recent statements made by France, the United Kingdom and Canada to recognize a Palestinian state. These moves are designed to bring in additional pressure on Israel to calm its military operations and reach a negotiation settlement with Hamas.

This diplomatic recognition, as well as the indifference that has been studied in America with the possibility of long military occupation – and perhaps not specified – Israeli, takes the United States and its allies in different directions significantly.

But both of them are implicitly recognized that the current situation is not to be defended, and that the negotiated peace is far from ever.

With Trump, there is no knowledge of the duration of this trend. But by the time Trump changes the path again, Israel may be on a Gaza road that will be very difficult to reverse.

Follow the transformations and turns in the second Trump state with the North American correspondent Anthony Zurer weekly American policy is not owned Newsletter. Readers in the United Kingdom can Subscribe here. Those can outside the United Kingdom Subscribe here.