James Gon agrees with the most controversial Superman scene in Zach Snyder

The superheroes who have been killed in the name of justice have been a controversial topic for decades now. In 1992, Tim Burton strange experience “Batman’s Odeh” He hit the theaters and managed to disturb the masses at several different levels. Parents (McDonald’s) were the general tone of the nightmare of the nightmare of Buerton Gotham, to the extent that Warner Bruce, the executives, decided to change the path significantly with the next movie, as Burton as a director in favor of Joel Schumacher, who then delivered more colored films in 1995, “Batman forever” (Batman forever “. Batman has been overlooked than the leading movie). But some fans felt dismay from “returns” for another reason-that is, Batman from Michael Keaton was a stone killer, as he tried a jet fuel criminal and blows another high sky without floundering.

It was quickly forward to 2010s and the same discussion that was running among fans, only this time also included the largest hero in the capital: Superman. When Zach Snyder took the creative lead of DC and Warner Bros, we came to a cinematic world that was much darker than we saw before. But this was not the darkness of the magic expressive horror. Snyder’s vision was almost dark and ridiculous on the source material, which was the best characteristic of it with a notorious moment in it The director criticized in response to the fans’ questions about Batman’s willingness to kill In “Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice.” “Wake up to the F *** up,” started the spaces. “Once you lose your virginity on this movie, then you come and tell me something like” My superhero will not do it. “I am like,” Are you serious? “

Perhaps it was more controversial that the dark knight that revolves around his victims in Snyder’s films was Henry Cavill Superman, doing the same in a notorious scene from the movie “Man of Steel” for the year 2013, in which the General Zod is settled from Michael Shannon to save a group of citizens of the capital from the hot vision in the villain. Of course, this did not decrease well with some fans of the character, who were previously known as Ultimate Boy Scout. The controversy over the DC -extended universe, known as Snyderrse, throughout its existence and remains the subject of controversial debate among fans today.

Now, we all introduced James Gon to a new, brighter and more light version than Superman. As such, you may expect it to be one of those who excelled from the deadly SNYDer Supes, but it seems that Gunn may be with Snyder Bros on this.

Take Zack Snyder on Superman was far from “Superman” from Richard Doner in 1978, which today remains the golden standard for superman (and the hero’s superhero films in general). The film is a distinguished celebration of everything represented by the personal, so it may be uncommon Donner had some strong opinions about DCEU eating on SupermanAnd even go to the extent of saying, “I think we are in strange and dark days from the manufacture of Moviem.”

You will be forgiven because you are thinking that James Gan, who beat the masses around the world with the trilogy of the “Colorful and Occupied and Friendly Galaxy”, will agree-in particular and that his vision of the newly launched DC is a group of newly released. Gon, who assumed the position of chief participating in the capital studios alongside Peter Safran in 2022, we now came to Satellite, witch crowds “Superman”, Institute the film with the humorous “guardians” and a lot of the heart, which represents the opposite of taking the most charming of superheroes. But it seems that Gon is not actually everything that opposes Superman kills, at least when he is a defense of an innocent life.

during Wireless Question and answer, Gon answered the question, “Why doesn’t Superman kill?” By agreeing that the character “believes in a basic right in life.” But the director “Superman” then continued to add an important warning: “I am not a summary in this regard, I think, for example, he had to be killed to protect a person’s life, he would likely do so, although this would be difficult for him.” In fairness, Gon does not necessarily say that everything was for the famous “steel man” scene in Snyder, but this is an implicit support for the idea of robbery when he needed it, which certainly means that Gon understood at least his directing predecessor.

Superman is known as a character of morals for the truth, justice, and “tomorrow is better”, unless you prefer the old school logo that ended in the “American Road”. Either way, the character is supposed to be a deep moral character that will never be killed if he does not have to do so. The Christopher Cover version of the character was never killed in 1978 “Superman” in 1978, although there was some debate about whether technically allowed to die to provide Trend Stam to die in “Superman II”. But Donner was replaced as a director in this movie, and in this way, Superman for 1978 is still an example of the character in popular consciousness – at least for several generations that grew up with a countryside as a steel man.

With this in mind, it was always controversial to pick up the necks of Henry Cavill in “Man of Steel”, regardless of whether the character had been killed on several occasions in the comedy. actually, The end of “Man of Steel” was controversial even before the movie appeared for the first timeThe producer, Christopher Nolan initially, made his best to persuade Zach Snyder to change it. However, ultimately, Snyder was allowed to realize his own vision, for the best or worse, the audience was shown on Superman was ready to kill to save innocent lives.

Now, we came to James Gan to the righteous man of David Cornsuin Superman, who looks like the last person to break the neck of his enemy. Based on Gunn’s comments, such a thing may not be completely uncomfortable. You can also read his answer as indicating that it is not interesting in reality to investigate this particular point about whether Superman will be killed if he pushes this – a type of “yes, he can do it greatly but he is not great or worth focusing on it.” What’s more, Superman was not limited to killing his enemy on the screen, but it will also be a tremendous problem if we see that the CorensWet version should take the same option in the near future-which can quickly empty the booming world of DC and its most optimistic tone. On the other hand, who says What will happen if “Superman” does not earn much money like “steel man” at the box office…