Tesla in court as a rare trial against Musk begins in Florida

Photo of author

By [email protected]


A rare trial began against Elon Musk Motor Company on Monday in Miami, where the jury will decide whether partially responsible for the death of a university student in the stars after Tesla sent her to fly about 23 meters in the air and her boyfriend was severely injured.

Prosecutor’s lawyers argue that the Tesla driver’s assistance feature, called Autopilot, should have warned the driver and interruption when his style sedan exploded through the flashy red lights, the stopping mark and a decline in about 112 km/h in the crash of April 2019. Tesla only blames the driver, which was reaching a Muscat mobile phone.

“The evidence clearly shows that this incident has nothing to do with the technology of the automated pilot in Tesla,” Tesla said in a statement. “Instead, like many unfortunate accidents since the invention of mobile phones, this was the cause of a dispersed driver.”

A lawsuit was filed on the driver, George McGi, separately by the plaintiffs. This case was settled.

The ruling against Tesla may be particularly harmful, as the company is working to persuade the public of self -driving technology safe during the process of offering a plan for hundreds of thousands of Tesla robots on American roads by the end of next year.

Silver sedan with the word Robotaxi is written on the door by the driver
The Tesla Robotaxi driver, which is a ride reservation service, moves through traffic, on June 22, in Austin, Texas. The company plans to obtain hundreds of thousands of robots on American roads by the end of next year. (Eric Jay/Associated Press)

A rare case for two reasons

The trial of the jury is rare for the company, which often settled lawsuits, and this trial is rare yet because the judge recently ruled that the Nabel Benavids family that could argue with punitive damage.

Judge Beth Bloom, from the American boycott court for the southern region of Florida, issued a partial brief ruling last month, where he was charged with defective manufacturing and defining neglect against Tesla. But she also ruled that the plaintiffs can argue with other claims that would make the company responsible and ask for punitive damage, which may be expensive.

“A reasonable jury can find that Tesla acted with a reckless ignorance of human life in order to develop its products and increase the profit to the maximum,” Blum said in a file.

The lawsuit dating back to 2021 claims that the driver relied on the automated pilot to reduce speed or stop when he discovered things on his way, including the suspended Chevrolet Tahoe that Benavids and her boyfriend, Delon Anfulo, were out of Ki West, Florida, to look at the sky. Tesla Al -Taho was shocked by highway speeds, causing it to rotate, landing it into BENAVIDED, dumping it in a wooded area and killing it.

In legal documents, Tesla denied almost all allegations of the lawsuit and said that she expects consumers to follow warnings in the car and instructions in the ownership guide, as well as compliance with the driving laws. Tesla warns its owners in evidence that its cars cannot drive themselves and that they should be ready to interfere at all times.

Watch | Will the definitions slow down the production of electric cars?

Stellantis Canadian production of EV is delayed on the definitions

Stelantis delay 2026 Dodge Charger Daytona R/T in Windsor because it weighs the effect of American definitions. The company says the jobs are not at risk, and other charger models will continue in the factory.



https://i.cbc.ca/1.7490661.1742608004!/cumulusImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_1180/tesla.jpg?im=Resize%3D620

Source link

Leave a Comment