Illon Musk waving the choice of the jury in the Tisla Outofilut deaths

Timing CEO Elon Musk He was not in a courtroom in Miami on Monday, but his name was chosen as a jury was chosen for a federal trial for a civil lawsuit for the Tesla crash in 2019, which killed one of the infantry and left other wounds badly when the car was in the car. Automated pilot situation.

One of the potential jury said: “Anything that involves Elon Musk is very difficult for me,” said one of the potential jury.

Another potential juror said that she could not be fair and fair to Tesla because of “the company’s ethics and ownership and what I saw in the news about her relationship with the government.”

The case is the first lawsuit against Tesla related to the deadly collision that involves the automatic automotive system of the electric car company.

This comes after months of Musk as a great advisor to the president Donald Trump The billionaire made a familiar name, synonymous with discounts in the huge federal workforce he made by the exile of his ideas, the Ministry of Government efficiency.

The richest man in the following world with Trump On the Federal Tax Reform Law on Taxes and Exhaustion, the headlines of newspapers and inject new drama are used to usually.

“It is difficult to hear the name Elon Musk and has no point of view, positive or negative,” Tesla Thomas Pranean’s lawyer told potential jury on Monday.

“This situation is not related to musk. But it is linked to the company,” Brangan said.

Three of potential jury sparked their hands to say, yes, they have opinions about musk that would make it impossible for them to deal with the case sharply.

“I would be difficult. I understand that it is not Tesla. But it is very connected to the tesla mark,” said one of the man.

Two other jury, who earlier expressed negative opinions about Musk, repeated these opinions of Tesla’s lawyer.

Pranean asked one of the jury about what this man wrote in response to the jury questionnaire about hearing things in news related to Tesla.

Two other jurys who previously spoke against Musk again spoke and shared the same opinions.

The man replied, “This situation revolves around what happened and not for him.”

“I am very independent,” he said. “I can be neutral, it is related to the accident and what happened.”

Six women and three men were chosen for the jury.

The lawsuit was filed in the US boycott court against Tesla by the Naibel Benefids family, the infantry who died from the accident and her friend Delon Annolo, who was seriously injured. The driver of the car, George McGi, is not invited to trial, and as stated, he settled with the plaintiffs earlier.

Prosecutors claim that the Autopilot feature of Tesla was defective and unsafe.

It is one of more than ten cases in which Tesla was prosecuted due to fatal or harmful accidents where the company’s autopilot conditions or complete conditions (under supervision) were used by a driver.

FSD is the excellent version of the TESLA automatic driving system. Autopilot is a standard option in all new Tesla compounds.

Tesla currently describes Autopilot as “an advanced driver assistance system that promotes safety and comfort behind the wheel.”

“In addition with the full self -driving (under supervision), you can drive your Tesla in almost anywhere, which leads to changes in the corridors, determining the fork to follow up on your mobile path, navigating vehicles and other things, left and right shift under your active supervision,” says Tesla.

After choosing the jury, Brett Shrebar, the lawyer, told the prosecutors, in an opening statement, “The evidence will appear for years before and after this crime, Tesla ignored the warnings.”

“Evidence of these motives will hear and why did Tesla do what they did.” “Was the Silicon Valley spirit of moving quickly and breaking things? This would be the design.”

The lawyer said: “What does not ignore is that the driver who was crashed was neglected, and drained his attention, on his phone and dropped it, and then grabbed it.” “I mocked my client about 60 miles per hour.”

“This is a state of shared responsibility. Tesla will not bear any responsibility for the failures of their automated pilot system. Evidence will appear that every actor needs a stage and that Tesla paves the way for the procedures that can be prevented that brings us here,” Shrebar said.

Evidence in the trial that shows that Musk made general statements about “Superhuman” sensors on Tesla vehicles.

At one of the conferences, Musk said that the car is “safer than a human being,” according to Cheber.

“The evidence clearly shows that this incident has nothing to do with Autopilot technology in Tesla. Instead, like many unfortunate accidents since the invention of mobile phones, this was the result of a distracted driver,” Tesla said, in a statement presented to NBC News.

The company said in 2019: “It is thanks to this, as he took responsibility for his actions because he was looking for his leak cell phone while also pressing the speedy, and quickly and canceling the car system at the time of the accident.

– Dan Mangana informed Manga from New York and Maria Pinero from Miami