“The lack of a tax on tips” looks great to explore history – as many will discover soon

With the gathering of Al -Mashayan in the cathedral, two politicians from New York full of scandal, they are running to become the coming mayor of the city, the former trial Andrew Como and the current mayor Eric Adams, he was happy with the foreground with the inhabitants of Congress and others. Zahran Mamdani, the leftist politician who will soon win a horrific victory over Komo in the democratic preliminary elections, worked in the middle of the road. The state lawmakers compared notes on when they arrived at the house last night after the final budget vote.

Before the Mass, the governor of the state, Cathy Hochol, the minority leader of the House Get up. They remembered the Rangel’s commitment to the poor and to the Harlem people, and how he did his greatest work in the Roads and Meaning Committee, through tax policy.

Taxes were the most effective tool for the government to establish the society we prefer. In the middle of the twentieth century, he paid the richest people in the United States More than 90 % Whoever entered the government every year, and this was redistributed in ways that designed a large and powerful medium layer. Since the 1980s, taxes have decreased on the rich significantly. It seems that the gap between the rich and the poor and the consequent social collapse in American society has been almost automatically followed from the changes in tax rates.

In his career in Congress, Rangel could not save the tide against the imposition of taxes on the rich, but he found ways and means to empower people through a smaller tax effect. His greatest achievement may be the creation Empowerment areasThe local communities designated by the federal government, where companies receive low interest and tax credit loans to employ the local population. Within eight years, as President Clinton noticed in his memorial, the Harlem empowerment area reduced unemployment from 20 % to 8 %.

Unintended consequences

It seems that the natural scene today for suggestions that are very friendly for workers, but if you are a full factor, the end of taxes on the Trump administration advice “One, Big Bell, Beautiful” Maybe it looks good – more money in your pocket, the least problem with your tax models.

beware. This is not the tax reform you are looking for. Just like the definitions, the taxable advice is an invitation to fraud. With the customs tariff, it is a fraud against the government (all) when importers buy inspectors and primary customs duties. With tips, it is for your presidents who deceive you personally. advice. Violation of rules party (Do not realize, as required by law, when you do not bring your one sub -advice worth $ 2.13/hour the wage to the minimum normal wages amounting to $ 7.50). Putting unattended workers in the gathering and securing them. Tax exempt advice is a weak alternative to End for wages for $ 2.13 And the minimum full wage (or more, much more) in addition to tips. In the state, the legislative reforms that prohibit the sub -wages of poverty and harassment decreased wherever they pass.

Then there is another problem in ending taxes on the tips. Historically, even when politicians and bureaucrats act in good faith to help workers earn more money, changing policy changes has created unintended consequences because managers and clients were interacting with them in unexpected ways.

Michael Syschi-azolina also explains in Your table is readyand His notes for the year 2022 of the New York City Restaurant, a slight change in the rules of the Tax Authority, destroyed one of the most important professions in this industry. Maître D was “a high dining room leader,” God “in traditional hot points like Copacabana a day, and Cecchi-Azzolina wrote that” to become Maître D “was the top of my career in my restaurant.” Then several years ago, the Tax Authority decided that Maître D was a manager, not a worker, and therefore it could not be included in the party gathering and a full salary should be paid. The goal of excluding Maître D ‘was to put more money in regular waiter pockets, but there was a side effect. Unwilling to pay the additional salary to advanced restaurant managers, the managers of advanced restaurants completely canceled, replacing him with the low host, and the low host (or more commonly, adding)-“Dimwits to obtain the minimum wage”, as the Cecchi-Azzolina-which stands at the door largely. As a result, the quality of the service decreased, especially for students who want to welcome dignity at the door by a person who knows them. The administration has responded to a slight change in the advice policy with a major change in employment policy, with severe consequences for customer service.

Or a change in implementation can lead to an unintended result. In recent years, with the help of the broader paper path in the transformation from paper money to credit cards, the Tax Authority has begun to provide advice on tax declarations with more carefully. This, in turn, has disturbed a long -term implicit agreement between employment and administration – they will turn a blind eye to the lack of reporting their employees for advice, and workers will in turn will accept a certain level of fraud and abuse from the administration – the cream, pay the time payment, screaming and abandonment. Once workers lose their end of the deal, they were less willing to bear administrative violations, creating a more aggressive workplace. We have just started to understand this effect on customer service.

Feeling a loss

This date is an unintended consequence. The first, controversial change in the US Federal Transformation Policy in the 1940s, came when Red railway capsFought the workers who hold your bags around a railway station, and won the fully minimal wages with the tips. (The red hats are still present today at the largest stations – you can search for them – and their grandchildren often work on airport stations restrictions. Red Caps found a loophole in its position as workers on the railway, the oldest and most organized modern industry. Unlike each other type of distinguished workers, including, for unseen reasons, two Pullman who actually worked on trains, and the government has set them to receive the minimum wage.

The railway managers, who are now on the hooks of the red cover, responded to the layoffs of the collective workers and accelerated by a network of spies. This was expected; When wages are imposed by government or unions, presidents try other strategies to reduce employment costs. Red CAP officials fought with the utmost to protect the functions and rights of members, and many alignment have been assigned again.

What was less predictive is the “Accounting and Guaranteed” plan invented by managers to meet the requirements of new wages. The fans of the stations made red hats filled their party’s profits on vouchers of paper, and if the advice comes with less than two dollars a day-eight hours in the minimum wage 25 percent-the station said that it will make up the difference. It is significantly similar to the TIP-credit system today, except that instead of sub-wage wage tips in addition to the highest when necessary, this was not at all tips in addition to the highest. This was a great way to avoid the requirements of the minimum wage law – if the workers report less than two dollars per day, the managers have launched them, claiming that they should be bad in their jobs. To avoid this fate, most red hats began to report $ 2 a day on profits every day.

The red hats found themselves in an unpredictable position, between the general transition less due to the new minimum wage and managers who refused to pay it. They forged the disposal records of the ends down, against their own interests, in order to maintain their jobs. They were making less than ever, and the union leaders complained. The press did not do much to publish the problem, but the federal investigators of the US Department of Labor’s wages and the watch division held hearings and a case went to the Supreme Court.

In the end, the court ruled that the administration could fulfill the minimum requirements for wages, but it wanted, but in the meantime, the railways changed its policy again, to the “checks and charges” system. The red cap is tie a perforated mark for each bag, gave half the mark to the passenger to recover the bag later, then pull the luggage away on a cart, and finish the tradition of the personal service provided by the red hats always.

Customers did not like it. Many people are misunderstood, they get low salaries, or they are badly acted. “I had one man, the president’s curse, the labor law and I,” Cornellius Tumson of Broad Street in Philadelphia also told the investigators. Even when they were not angry, Thompson indicated that customers might feel a loss, as well as. The reformers and union leaders who fought in order to give red hats the full minimum wage this change were not coming, and they were facing a problem in seeing it when he arrived. Their reports celebrated the end of Red Caps on advice and ignored the feeling of loss.

Tax law

If we end the tax on advice, what are the unintended consequences that will reshape the working conditions and customer service? Imagine the surprise of tax -free workers, will employers drop basic wages and will customers reduce advice, which makes the lives of workers more fearful and more occurring to abusive customers? Or is the promise of non -taxable advice has no little effect on wages and the amounts of transformation? Will the workers become more cautious and get up on their way? Or will they give them a bonus of tips that are not more confident to put unbridled customers in their place? Will the professions rise or disappear? What do we not imagine?

Two weeks ago, directly on Broadway, north of Manhattan courts, came to a group of political and journalists. Near the center, I got to know the man who sat next to Bew, a few days ago, at the Rangel funeral. I took advantage of him on the shoulder and asked what was going on. He was working with Brad Lander, another candidate in the mayor’s preliminary elections, who had Just was arrested By American immigration and customs enforcement agents (ICE), the Federal Agency responsible for finding and deporting immigrants. They seem to believe that Lander is interfering with the arrest of an immigrant named Eduardo who wanted to deport them. (The charges against Lander were dropped at a later time.)

O fool, I didn’t say, although I might have been. Didn’t you learn anything from the funeral of Rangel? Immigration policy is not the way forward to justice and equality. It is the tax law! But this is not the proposed tax law, not to end taxes on advice.

The opinions expressed in cutting comments Fortune.com are only the opinions of their authors and do not necessarily reflect opinions and beliefs luck.

Read more: