“Comments that were insulting to …”: The startup company cancels the job offer for the candidate after checking the background, and discussing Sparks

An young company based in Mumbai sparked a hot debate on the Internet after canceling the job offer on the candidate’s social media comments. Mohamed Ahmed Bahi, the founder of the Jobbie Employment Platform, announced on LinkedIn that his team withdrew the offer after examining the background revealed that the candidate had made “insulting comments towards religious societies” in public positions.

Soon the viral post went. “I was impressed by the interview, we were ready to make an offer higher than our budget. But during the final examination of the background, we found recent public comments that were insulting to religious societies. Regardless of the extent of a person’s skill, respect and basic elegance for us more.” He added: “The talent makes you in the door. Values ​​decide whether you are staying.”

The post also referred to the pre -emptive efforts of the candidate, such as creating a CV using the private Jobbie platform and suggesting ways to improve the product, as part, which impressed the team at the beginning.

However, the company’s decision has led to sharp criticism through social media, as many have interrogated whether the year’s year’s dealing with the situation is moral or simply exposed to itself.

One commentator said: “You are trying to confirm your authority … to determine who is appointed based on whether it is in line with your beliefs.” Another user called him “a way to circumvent propaganda” added, “Sharing this on LinkedIn only for the eyes of the eyes makes you look like a good creature, and he is definitely no.”

Others have pointed to the contradictions in employment practices. “So why are these background checks not performed before the brief menu?” He read one of the comments, and asked to the timing of the display withdrawal.

Some also raised concerns about the high “culture” in the workplace and its broader effects. One of the users wrote: “The cancellation of a display based on a person’s social media activity explains how the culture of cancellation can affect institutions when people enter the wrong in leadership positions.”

While Bahi did not publicly respond to the reverse reaction, his post ended with a question for his network: “What do you think, did we do the right thing?” It seems that the Internet still decides.