On Friday, the Congo and Rwanda signed a peace agreement that the United States facilitated to help end the deadly fighting fighting in the eastern Congo with the help of American companies and American companies to reach critical minerals in the region.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described it as “an important moment after 30 years of war.” Earlier, US President Donald Trump said at a press conference that he managed to mediate in a deal “one of the worst wars that anyone has ever seen.”
“I managed to collect and sell them,” Trump said. “Not only that, we get the United States a lot of metal rights from the Congo.”
The agreement was described as an important step towards peace in the Congo State of Central Africa, where it contradicts more than 100 armed groups, the most powerful Rwanda, which has killed millions since the 1990s.
It is also at the heart of Trump’s batch to reach the critical metals needed for most technology in the world at a time when the United States and China are actively competing to influence Africa.
Analysts believe that the deal is a major turning point, but they do not believe that it will quickly end the fighting. The agreement includes provisions on regional integrity and ban on hostilities, as well as disengagement, disarmament and conditional integration of non -governmental armed groups.
The peace deal is unlikely to end the conflict quickly
Rwanda -backed M23 Repel group is the most prominent armed group in the conflict, and left its main progress of this year in the streets.
With the displacement of seven million people in the Congo, the United Nations described it as “one of the most severe humanitarian crises, complicated, and dangerous on earth.”
The Congo hopes that the United States will supply the necessary security to combat the rebels and may make them withdraw from the main cities in Gouma and Bocavo, as well as from the entire region, where Rwanda is estimated at 4000 soldiers. Rwanda said she is defending her regional interests and does not support M23.
The M23 rebels suggested that the agreement would not be bound for them. The rebel group did not directly participate in the planned peace deal, although it was part of the other ongoing peace talks.
“The country’s immediate peace talks with the Congo cannot be held unless the country recognizes its grievances and that” anything related to us is done without us, it is against us.
A M23 spokesman, Oscar Palinda, chanted those ideas in an interview with AP this week, saying that the deal that was adhered to in the United States does not concern the rebels.
Rwanda has also been accused of exploiting East Congo minerals, and analysts in the direction may make it difficult for Rwanda not to participate in any way in the region. Critical metals are used in smartphones, advanced combat aircraft and much more.
A team of United Nations experts claimed in a report issued in December that “fraudulent extraction, trade and export to Rwanda from metal (Congo) benefited from AFC/M23 and the Rwandan economy.” Rwanda denied any involvement in Congo minerals.
The deal is also at the heart of the US government batch to confront China in Africa. For many years, Chinese companies have been one of the main players in the metal sector in the Congo. Chinese cobalt refineries, which represent the majority of the global show, depends heavily on the Congo.
Why Donald Trump is coming to come after the critical minerals in Canada? After that, despite inflation in cooling, the low interest rate and fixed employment numbers, more Canadians miss the payments on their loans and mortgages. Andrew Chang explains why.
Happy proposal
Analysts say that commitment to the United States may depend on the amount of access to the minerals that are discussed under separate negotiations between American governments and Congolese.
Unemployed minerals are often estimated at $ 24 trillion by the US Department of Commerce.
Christian Mulka, a political scientist in the acceptance of Congolese thought, described the deal as a “major turning point” in decades -long struggle, but he said that the signature “can in no way be eliminated by all conflict issues.”
He said: “The current draft agreement ignores the war and justice crimes of the victims by imposing a partnership between the victim and the aggressor.” “This looks like a very happy proposal and cannot prove permanent peace without justice and reform.”
In Kivu County in the northern Congo, the most difficult fighting strike, some believe that the peace agreement will help resolve violence but warns that justice must be offered for permanent peace.
“I don’t think the Americans should trust 100 percent,” said Aminuka, a boycott activist. “It is up to us to take advantage of everything we have now as an opportunity.”
The conflict can be tracked to the 1994 mass extermination in Rwanda, where the Hutu militias killed between 500,000 and a million ethnic tuts, as well as moderate Hutos and the indigenous people. When the Tots forces resisted nearly two million Hatus via the Congo, for fear of revenge.
The Rwandan authorities accused the Hotos who fled to participate in the genocide and claimed that the members of the Congolese army were protecting them. They have argued that the militias posed by a small part of the Hutos posed a threat to the Tutsi residents in Rwanda.
The World Food Program warns of lack of food, clean water and medical supplies in Goma, in the east of the Congo, where the waves of fighting led to the displacement of thousands of people and supply chains.
https://i.cbc.ca/1.7573068.1751050042!/cpImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_1180/us-congo-rwanda-rubio.jpg?im=Resize%3D620
Source link