Legislators say that the United States should balance speed and safety in the race of artificial intelligence against China

Photo of author

By [email protected]


On Wednesday, lawmakers asked about the balance between speed and safety when discussing artificial intelligence (AI) The regulations and the need for the United States to control China in the race to develop emerging technology.

Parties in the Committee for the selection of the Chinese Communist Party of Parliament insisted that the United States should lead the revolution of artificial intelligence, and not an authoritarian force like China, during a hearing in the Capitol Hill.

“China is a comprehensive pushing AGI, which will inevitably seek to survey and suppress us at every turn,” said Raja Krishnammur, a member of the rank. “We cannot let this happen. The nightmare scenario should be an invitation to wake up for Congress.”

“I agree that artificial intelligence is the new Cold War between the United States and China … it is in fact the Manhattan project for our generation.”

Bipartisan Bill House NSA directs to the creation of “Playbook Ai Security” in the Chinese technology race

Representative Dasti Johnson, Rurawi, talks to journalists

Dusty Johnson asked RS. (Tom Williams / CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images / Getty Images)

Witnesses stressed the need for the leadership of the United States to develop artificial intelligence, saying that the federal organizational framework must be based on confidence, otherwise the United States will endanger the risk of reducing development with the organizational reaction.

“We do not have a ready -made nuclear energy now, due to this regulatory correction,” said Mark Bell, head of government affairs in the I intelligence policy network. “I think the smart handrail today at the federal level can help prevent the organizational reaction in the future in ways that harm (industry).”

“We need a federal framework that can give us a sense of the coherent legislative path forward,” said Jack Clark, co -founder and head of politics at AI Safety and Research Company.

Without one, Clark said he was concerned about “creating a vacuum” that could lead to an exaggerated reaction.

He said, “As the viewer of others said, in the event of an accident or misuse, in this void, he will be immersed in excessive extreme organization,” he said.

Representative Deast Johnson, Rurawi, pointed to the clear conflict between speed and safety in the artificial intelligence race.

“It seems to me that safety and speed are conflicting values,” Johnson said. “When you give priority to anyone, you will get bodies on the other hand. I have noticed that we have to reach safety, right? And I just feel curious how important the risk is to do so, we prevent our ability to win this race?”

The best technology expert in Trump does not know we cannot get to know the competition of artificial intelligence with China

Dr. Thomas Mahanin, President and Executive Director of the Center for Strategic and Budget Assessments, answered that the United States must rely on its deep democratic values ​​and high confidence in innovation, although there is concern that safety concerns may hinder the United States.

“If I have more anxiety, we will not go quickly enough because we will link ourselves with a contract to worry about all the things that happen,” said Mahninkin.

Mahain said he was also concerned about excessive organization.

He said, “The other concern that I have is excessive organization, as I took advice to our fears and admired the dynamic in the American Foundation.”

However, China may not have such fears of safety in the global race to dominate artificial intelligence.

Get Fox Business on the Go by clicking here

“My doubts are the lack of a parallel conversation in the People’s Republic of China about all the risks,” said Mahninkin.



https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxbusiness.com/foxbusiness.com/content/uploads/2025/06/0/0/dusty-johnson.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

Source link

Leave a Comment