Al -Fawiya wins the rights of copyright AI Meta – but there is hunting

Record dead a A great victory in a lawsuit for copyright On Wednesday, when a federal judge spent that the company did not violate the law when it trained the tools of artificial intelligence on 13 books for the author without permission.

“The court has no choice but to grant a brief ruling on Meta to claim the prosecutors that the company violated the copyright law by training its models on their books,” said the American District Court Judge Vince Chapria in a brief ruling. He concluded that the plaintiffs did not provide enough evidence that the use of dead books was harmful.

In 2023, a high -level group of authors, including comedian Sarah Silverman, filed a lawsuit against Mita, claiming that the technology giant had violated copyright by training his great language models on their work. Kadrey v. Meta It was one of the first cases of its kind; Now there are dozens of copyright cases of similar artificial intelligence belonging to the American courts.

Chapria had previously confirmed that he intended to consider carefully whether the plaintiffs had sufficient evidence to show that the use of a dead work would harm them financially. He wrote in the ruling on Wednesday: “The main question in almost any case, as the defendant copied the work of the original person without permission, whether allowing people to engage in this type of behavior will significantly reduce the market for the original.”

This is the second main ruling in the world of publishing rights this week. On Monday, Judge William Al Sap Ruling Anthropor’s use of copyright -protected materials to train their artificial intelligence tools was legally. Chapria referred to Alsup’s brief judgment in his decision.

Chapria made pain to confirm that his rule was dependent on a specific set of facts in this case – which leads to the opening of the door for other authors to sue Meta due to the violation of copyright in the future. “In the great plan of things, the consequences of this ruling are limited. This is not a collective action, and therefore the ruling only affects the rights of these 13 authors – and not countless others whose work is used to training their models.” “As it should be clear now, this ruling does not stop the proposal that the use of Meta for copyrights to train its language models is legal.”

This is a developing story. Please check again for updates.