The rule of copyright for the Antholbrobe Mark is a victory for the artificial intelligence industry – but the company is still on a hook for piracy claims

But the company is still on a hook and must now go to the experience on how to gain these books by downloading them from “shadow libraries” on the Internet for pirated copies.

The American boycott judge, William Alsup from San Francisco, said in a ruling later on Monday that the artificial intelligence system is from thousands of written works to be able to produce his text clips, qualifying “fair use” under the Publishing Rights Law in the United States because it was “transformed”.

“Like any reader who aspires to be a writer, anthropologist models (large language models of artificial intelligence) have been trained on not racing forward, repeated or replaced – but to turn into a solid angle and create something different.”

But as he rejected a major claim by the group of authors who filed a lawsuit against the company for violating copyright last year, Alsup also said that Antarubor still has to go to trial in December because of its alleged theft of their work.

Alsup wrote: “Anthropor had no entitlement to use pirate copies of its central office,” Alsup wrote.

Three of the book-Andrea Partz, Charles Graper, Kirk Wallace Johnson-in a lawsuit last summer claimed that the anthropology practices had “widespread theft”, and that the company “seeks to benefit from enhancing human expression and creativity behind each of these works.”

As the case advanced over the past year at the Federal Court of San Francisco, documents that were revealed in the Court showed the internal concerns of the Anjurubor about the legitimacy of its use of online warehouses for pirated business. So the company later transferred its approach and tried to buy copies of digital books.

“Anthropor later bought a copy of a book that I had stolen earlier in the Internet that will not exempt her from responsibility for theft, but it may affect the extent of legal damage,” Alsup wrote.

The ruling can put a precedent for Similar lawsuits That accumulated against the anthropoor competitor Openai, the ChatGPT maker, as well as against Meta platforms, the parent company for Facebook and Instagram.

In 2021-Antarubor-which was founded by the former Obina leaders in 2021-did the same as a more responsibility developer and focus on the models of obstetric intelligence that can compose emails, summarize documents and interact with people in a natural way.

But the lawsuit filed last year claimed that the Antarubor actions “mocked its fiery goals” by taking advantage of the pirated writings warehouses to build its intelligence product.

Anthropor said on Tuesday that it was pleased that the judge realized that artificial intelligence training was transformative and consistent with “the purpose of copyright in empowering creativity and promoting scientific progress.” Its statement did not address piracy claims.

The authors’ lawyers refused to comment.