The United States accuses the violations of Trump officials of intentionally ignoring the orders of the court Donald Trump News

A former American lawyer in the US Department of Justice (doj) published the complaint of those informed of the violations that deliberately accused officials of the court’s orders that may hinder the campaign of US President Donald Trump for collective deportation.

On Tuesday, Eris Revinie representatives submitted a 35 -page complaint that clarified the lawyer’s allegations against the Trump administration.

It offers a look at the discussions and departments that are revealed behind the scenes in the Ministry of Justice, as it is defending Violations of rights.

The Trump administration members led to “participating in illegal activity, and offended the treatment of their authority, (and) created a major and specific threat to health and safety,” according to the message.

As a result, she says, “Mr. Reuveni exercises his rights … to report violations.”

The message was sent to members of Congress, as well as the Inspector General of the Ministry of Justice, who investigate the allegations of misconduct within the office. Reuveni was eventually launched in April.

One of the administration officials, who is prominent in his allegations, is Emil Bouv, who was previously working as a personal lawyer for Trump. Bouv Defense Trump against criminal charges last year in New York, where he was convicted of him 34 charges From falsifying business documents.

Trump has since named Bouv to be part of his second term as president. During the first three months of Trump’s state, Bouv was at the Public Prosecution at the Ministry of Justice. This week, he faces a confirmation session in the Senate for his candidacy to join the Court of Appeal in the third American district as a judge.

Auditing the deportation trips

One accident claimed to have occurred on March 14, when Trump was weighing whether the War Time Law should be used – Foreign enemies Law in 1798 To pave the way for the expedited removal of the country.

According to Reuveni, Bove, the lawyer for the Ministry of Justice, told Trump that Trump will soon sign an order to summon the law, which was only three times in the history of the United States, all during war periods.

Bove added that the planes will underestimately take off and deport individuals under the rule of law.

But as Reuveni remembers, Bove expects a reaction from the courts. He said that Bove “stressed everyone in the attendees that the planes need to take off regardless of what” and that the Ministry of Justice “will need to think about informing the courts.”

The room’s silence, according to Dovember, who noticed “embarrassing nerve looks” among his colleagues.

Al -Shakawi said, “Mr. Ruvenini was astonished by Bouv’s statement because, with regard to the knowledge of Mr. Ruvenini, no person in the leadership of the Ministry of Justice – in any administration – said that the Ministry of Justice could ignore the court’s orders in starkly, especially with” P *** you “.

He added that the Ministry of Justice usually advises its government agents to follow the orders of the court, and not to ignore them.

The next day, on March 15, the government’s use of the law of foreign enemies was challenged in a local American court in Washington, DC, led by Judge James Boasberg.

Upon interrogation by Boasberg, high -level lawyer of the Ministry of Justice denied knowing whether any deportation trips were launched in a dramatic way. In his complaint, Reuveni said this statement is a liar.

Later that day, Boasberg issued a judicial order prohibiting any removal operations under the Law of Foreign Enemies and asking any American aircraft carrying out such deportation to return to the country.

Reuveni said he sent an email to the Ministry of Internal Security and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs several times in the hours that followed to ensure their compliance with Boasberg’s order. But he said he did not receive any response.

Flights ultimately In SalvadorWhere hundreds of immigrants who were deported were sent to a prison called the terrorist detention center or Cecot.

Mr. Reuveni expected the government to be held In the contempt of the court To exhaust those on the trip, “read the complaint.

Boasberg has since indicated that it has found a possible reason for contempt by the Trump administration, although the Court of Appeal has temporarily stopped procedures on this issue.

Inside the case of Abrego Garcia

In a second case, it was detailed in the complaint, Reuveni said he tried to alert the Trump administration that he might be violated by another court – only “is required to stop asking questions.”

Moreover, Reuveni claimed that he had received advice for “communicating by phone only wherever you can”, and is supposed to avoid leaving a paper path.

A third episode explained in the complaint sheds light on the participation of Reuveni in the prominent case Kilmar Abigo Garcia, Salvadori was a protection order that allowed him to stay in the United States.

However, Abo Garcia was deported on March 15, while officials admitted it as an “administrative mistake”.

However, the Trump administration defended its actions by accusing Appiro Garcia of membership in a gang, MS-13.

Despite the court order, which was supported by the Supreme Court, “to facilitate” the return of Abu Garcia, the Trump administration left the Salvadori nursery for more than two months. Only on June 6 I did so Return it to the United StatesOn the basis that he will face Criminal charges For human trafficking.

In the complaint, Reuveni said, initially, I believe that the return of Abo Garcia to the United States would be “clear.”

But he then said that he was stoned and was told to “stop submitting applications” and “stop requesting the facts that support any possible defense of the case.” It is also frustrated by “asking” about the government of El Salvador.

Reuveni later occupied newspaper headlines to waive it in court that Aberigo Gargo should not be removed from the country. He also said he had no “satisfactory” answers to the judge’s questions in the case, Paula Shinis.

This incident was seen as a black eye of the Trump administration.

Behind the closed doors, the Ruveni president asked him why Abyerigo Garcia was not accused of being a “terrorist member” during the court session, according to the complaint. Reuveni said he answered that the government had not provided evidence or provided summaries to support this argument.

When the Trump administration distributed an appeal on April 4, these arguments were submitted, Ruvenini said he could not sign them because allegations were “not supported by law or registry.”

“Mr. Ruvenini answered,” I have not registered in lying, “the complaint said.

Professional repercussions

By April 11, Reuveni was expelled from his position with the Ministry of Justice, nearly 15 years of service.

Prosecutor Bam Bondi issued a statement at the time accusing him of not “calling for enthusiasm on behalf of the United States,” as expected by a government lawyer. But Ruvenini’s complaint tops this accusation.

“Inhibition of customers from engaging in illegal behavior is an important part of the lawyer’s role,” she says. “Mr. Reuveni tried to do this and was frustrated, threatened, expelled and threatened publicly because of his job and informing the truth in the court.”

The complaint indicates that Reuveni has previously received “stars” assessments of his work policy, including during Trump’s first term.

However, with the distribution of the complaint news to the American media, members of the Trump administration sought to fram Ruven’s claims as a “indignant” former employee.

The Deputy Prosecutor said Todd Blanche in a statement On social media.

Reuveni accused the media such as New York Times, which has published a copy of the Reuveni complaint, of trying to sabotage Bove’s chances of asserting as the judge of the Court of the Department.

“This is disgusting press,” he wrote. “Cultivating a wrong blow the day before the confirmation session is something we expect from the media, but this does not mean that it should be tolerated.”

Meanwhile, Democrats seized the complaint as evidence of bad violations in the Trump administration.

“Emile Bove does not respect the rule of law and the orders of the court. It does not belong to his federal seat,” Senator Korea Booker Books on social media.

Senator Dick Durbin, at the same time, issued a statement Reuveni praise for advancing as violations. He said that the Senate has a commitment to act on the “dangerous allegations” raised about Bove.

Durbin wrote: “I would like to thank Mr. Reuveni for exercising his right to speak and bring accountability to Mr. Bove.” “And I ask my colleagues in the Senate: Do not turn a blind eye to the dire consequences of confirming Mr. Bouv to the position of life as the judge of the Court of the Department.”