The director of Exorcist III begged to the studio to change one thing about the complementary of terror

We may receive a commission on the purchases made of links.

The 1990 horror movie “The Exorcist III” was based on his novel “Legion” for the year 1983 “, which is a follow -up of his novel” The Exorcist “for the year 1971. Although both writers appear common characters (the police investigator who are the protagonist, and speaks to Father Damian Kras), they are a different kind of story, where it was done Its organization is similar to the joint procedural police, the deadly murderer (based on the symbols of Zodiac), and the supercarium.

“The Exorcist III” was not a great success in 1990, but it underwent a great reassessment over the years, and some cinema you consider now Almost good like William Friedkin in 1973 with “The Exorcist”. Kinderman was played in George C Scott movie (LEE J It also features some very strong and disturbing images (Including intimidating the notorious jump) The climax with a semi -comprehensive conversation links spirituality, demons and divine. It is complicated, consistent, ambitious, and very good.

Like his novel, Blatty was hoping to call his movie in 1990 “Legion” and he had no global “exorcist” in its title. Early harassment of the movie He suggested that Blatty was initially able to reach a compromise with the film studio supporters, as they refer to the movie called “The Exorcist III: Legion”. Blatty, as you see, wanted to stand his movie on his own, but he also wanted to distance himself from the 1977, EXORCIST II: The Heretic “. Unfortunately, executive officials in the end insisted that the word “talisman” appear in the title and that the actual evil spirits were expelled in the movie.

Blatty was convinced that “The Exorcist III” was simply floating at the box office because it was called “The Exorcist III”. He felt that he could tell an interesting story and attract a huge audience without having to remind them of decisive and commercial flop in Burman. Blatty also did not want to have an actual evil spirits in the movie or tell a story without two parties. While the film was in production, the Fox Studio in the twentieth century and its Morgan Creek’s production colleague was kicking around different titles, including “Exorcist: Legion” and “The Exorcist: 1990”, but Blatty remained insisting that it was a bad idea.

Blatty’s protest was recorded on this memo Bob Bob Maccabi for 2000 “The Exorcist: Out of the Shadows.” As it put it:

“I begged them when they were thinking about nicknames that they were not named.”mascot Anything – because ”EXORCIST II ‘ It was a disaster that exceeded imagination. You cannot call it “EXORCIST III“Because people will avoid the box office. But they went and called it”EXORCIST IIIThen they called me after the third week, when we started fading into the box office, and they said: “We will tell you the reason: it will be painful, you will not do that – the reason is it.”EXORCIST II. “ I couldn’t believe that! They had total memory loss about my warnings! “

Morgan Kreik also insisted that Blatty includes the expulsion of evil spirits in the movie (an element that was not present in his original book). Blatty has also protested about it, but it ended up being filmed anyway. In the end, Jason Miller was appointed to return as a brochure for this unnecessary sequence, which added an additional $ 4 million to the film’s budget. However, Miller was not able to act due to severe alcohol addiction, so Brad Dorif played the character in the rest of the movie (with all his scenes filming after the truth).

Despite all the notes and changes imposed by the studio, “The Exorcist III” has turned wellAnd horror lovers around the world have loved his ambition. Blatty’s ideas came despite everything else, and although his original vision of the film may be better, the version we got was not bad.