Iran’s policy Donald Trump

In the world of Donald Trump, with himself as the novel, the conflict in Iran reveals in three stages over a period of 48 chaotic hours.

On Saturday, he started with the American President to order Bhombers B-2 to drop the advanced bombs On Iranian nuclear facilitiesSending the United States to Israel’s war with the Islamic Republic.

Sunday, Trump He was floating on the possibility of “changing the system” in Tehran, which was happier in the traditional foreign policy of foreign policy, but was concerned about its isolationist right -wing allies.

Then, on Monday, when it seemed that the 79 -year -old was interested in the United States towards the Middle East strategy for the neo -conservatives in the era of George W. Bush, he announced that the hatred would be buried.

Congratulations to everyone! Trump announced the social truth, declaring that Israel and Iran Agree To the “full and full ceasefire” that will start within hours. The end of the conflict, which was called the “12 -day war”, will live by the world.

The sudden and a lot of Trump towards reconciliation was the limited nature of the Iranian response to the bombing raid on the US weekend.

Trump said that while Tehran fired missiles at the large American military base in Qatar on Monday, he did this after Washington gave “an early notice.” Unlike the American strikes, which he said they “completely destroyed” the Iranian nuclear sites, he left the American base of Tehran – and its members – safely.

The training course, which is taking place in Iran, once again revealed how the American president alternates between loud threats, the efforts made to reduce deals, severe measures, and sudden victory rolls-even when the issues are important at stake.

The world negotiators and investors in the world are familiar with Trump’s policy, as a high tariff slapped many American commercial partners before they retracted each other. But about national security, he was brought by the divided president’s personality Public yearning For the Nobel Peace Prize to launch a direct attack on Iran.

Another turning towards peace is worth caution. certificate The American bombing raid destroyed Iranian nuclear establishments was not established by Monday, and Iran and Israel’s response to the ceasefire – or its durability – were not also known.

But by planting the seeds of regime change, foreign policy experts in Washington said that Trump has increased the pressure on the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, to provide more concessions at the negotiating table and not to follow more revenge – or to face a possible effort for the United States to end his rule.

(Trump) says: “There is a lot that we can do to attack the forces of this system and its main institutions. And if you run out in a way that gives us a reason to do more, then you need to be aware that this is the place he is heading to. ”

Zainab Riboa of the Hudson Institute for Peace and Security in the Middle East said that Israel’s air strikes on Iran this month also showed Trump how the country was “vulnerable” to the country.

“I think (Trump) realizes that the collapse is a possible scenario, and it may also get credit. I think this is where his head is.”

The administration’s signals have been mixed about its intentions since the American strikes. On Sunday morning, senior American officials, including Vice President JD Vance and Defense Minister Ptegse, went out, by saying that the United States does not seek to change the system in Tehran. Their statements were undermined by Trump floating on the possibility of a new Iranian leadership later in the day.

White House press secretary Caroline Levit defended the President’s comments on Monday,

“If the Iranian regime refuses to reach a peaceful diplomatic solution – which the president is still interested in participating – then why should the Iranian people not take off the power of this violent regime incredibly?” Levitte said on Fox.

Molo Maga was angry at the shift towards a change of order, but they were comfortable with the apparent result after Trump announced the ceasefire.

“Thank you, President Trump, for following peace!” Georgia member Margia, Taylor Green, wrote on X.

Trump’s strike and comments on the Iranian leadership sparked praise from more new conservative Republicans such as Nikki Haley, his presidential rival in 2024, and his former security adviser John Bolton.

Some of his supporters were trying to consolidate their belief in the president by violating him.

Charlie Kerk, the prominent conservative media host and activist in Maga, insisted that Trump was looking for a revolution “from bottom to top” in Iran, rather than changing the government imposed by the United States. “President Trump talks about an membership uprising,” he wrote on X.

Robert Satellov, CEO of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said that Trump still prefers “the end of negotiations for this conflict, and a diplomatic solution that could include relief for a major penalty if Iran plays its correct cards.”

He said that the comparisons with Bush’s invasion of Iraq in 2003 were wrong, even when Israel – an ally of the United States – began attacking some columns of the Iranian regime, such as the famous Evin prison.

“Even if he decides to target some sensitive assets of the regime, such as the Israelis who started to do today, we are still far from changing the regime and we are responsible for the back government as we were in Iraq in 2003,” said Satellov.

Meanwhile, Trump’s call for “additional lack of hatred” in the Middle East may give way to another development – and more escalation.

Rajan Menon, a professor of honorary political science at the city college in New York, said that Trump may believe that the weak Iran will now sign a nuclear deal – but this was not guaranteed.

“To avoid changing the system, they must make it clear that the system controls and does not wander on a foreign power.”