Trump’s Supreme Court allows the resumption of deportation to the third countries

the supreme court On Monday, the Trump administration allowed the resumption of rapid deportations of some immigrants to countries other than their pre -warning, and the opportunity to challenge them on the basis that they end up torture or killing.

The court raised Judiciary It was released in April by the federal provincial court judge in Massachusetts, which prevented this practice, which was placed in place yet Executive order The president signed it Donald Trump In January.

The Supreme Court order will remain in effect as an appeal in the case by the Trump administration.

The three liberal Supreme Court judges spent this matter.

“I cannot greatly join the abuse of the just court’s appreciation,” Judge Sonia Sotomoor said in a written opposition.

“Fire on deportation planes,” the Assistant Deputy Minister of Internal Security, Tricia McLeulin.

“The rule of Scotos is a victory for the safety and security of the American people.” The Biden Administration has allowed millions of illegal foreigners to dump our country, and now, the Trump administration can underestimate its authority to remove these illegal foreigners and clean this nightmare of national security.

The head of the legal group, which represents immigration in a lawsuit that led to the matter, said in a statement: “The repercussions of the Supreme Court order will be terrifying, as they cut the protection of the due legal procedures that were protecting members of our ranks from torture and death.”

“It is important that the court ruling only represents the authority of the court to provide this protection at this middle stage of the case,” said Trina Ryano, Executive Director of the National Migration Alliance. “We now need to move quickly as possible to produce the issue and restore this protection.” \

“On matters of life and death, it is better to move forward with caution”, one of these judges.

“In this case, the government followed the opposite approach.”

“One of the plaintiffs deported one of the plaintiffs to Guatemala, although the immigration judge found that he could face torture there,” she wrote. “Then, in a clear violation of the court’s order, it deported six others to southern Sudan, a country that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs considers to be unsafe for everyone except for its most important members.”

“The intervention of the vigilant boycott in a timely manner is only a third group of illegal removal to Libya,” Sotomior wrote.

She wrote: “Instead of allowing our colleagues in the lower court to manage this high -level vowage with care and attention that it requires clearly, this court is now interfering to grant the government to relief in emergency situations from a matter of challenge over and over again.”