Trump is open to change the regime in Iran, after his administration said this was not the goal

Photo of author

By [email protected]



On Sunday, President Donald Trump summoned the future of Iran’s ruling theocrats Sudden attack In three nuclear sites of the country, it seems to contradict the calls of its previous administration to resume negotiations and avoid escalation in the fighting.

“It is not politically correct to use the term,” change the system “, but if the current Iranian regime is unable to make Iran a great again, then why will there be a change in the regime ??? Trump posted on social media?” Mega !!! ”

Publishing on the social truth was a bit of reflection from the Defense Minister Beit Higseth Conference on Sunday morning, which explains the weather details.

“This task was not and was not about changing the system,” said Higseth.

What the administration has made clear is that it wants Iran to stop any development of nuclear weapons, with Foreign Minister Marco Rubio warning Fox The news “Future Sunday morning” that any revenge against the United States or the rush towards building a nuclear weapon “endangers the regime.”

But moreover, the world is immersed in uncertainty in a fragile moment, it can decide whether parts of the world start in the war or find a way to save a relative peace. Trump’s warning comes to the leadership of Iran, as the United States demanded that Iran not respond to bombing the heart of a nuclear program that spent decades.

The Trump administration has made a series of frightening data even with its recall simultaneously to restore negotiations, which makes it difficult to read whether the American president simply mocks the opponent or the use of the words of inflammation that could increase the expansion of the war between Israel and Iran, which started earlier this month.

Even the position of US President on Sunday afternoon, the coordinated correspondence by Trump’s vice president, Pentagon, senior military advisers and foreign minister suggested that any controlled repercussions and that Iran’s lack of military capabilities will eventually bring it back to the bargaining table.

Higseth said America “does not seek war” with Iran, while Vice President JD Vance said that the strikes gave Tehran the possibility of returning to negotiate with Washington.

But the situation that is completely unlike Washington’s control, as Tehran has a series of wheels to respond to the air bombings that can intensify the conflict in the Middle East with possible global repercussions. Iran can prevent oil that is shipped through the Strait of Hermoz, attacking American bases in the region, or engaging in Internet attacks or doubling in a nuclear program that may seem more necessary after the American strike.

All this raises the issue of whether the strikes will open a more brutal stage of fighting or reviving negotiations than an abundance of caution. Inside the United States, the attack was quickly poured into domestic policy with Trump’s choice to spend a part of Sunday who is chasing his critics in Congress.

Trump, who delivered the nation’s speech from the White House on Saturday night, returned to social media on Sunday to MP Lamasti Thomas Massi, RCK, who objected to the president to take military measures without specific approval in Congress.

“We have achieved amazing military success yesterday, and we took the” bomb “directly from their hands (and they used it if they could!)” Trump said as part of the position on the social truth.

What Trump’s national security team said

In the joint Pentagon, Higseth and General Gen. Dan Kane, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that the “midnight Hummer” involves partners and deception, and has not met any Iranian resistance.

Kane noted that the goal of the operation – destroying nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Estehan – has been fulfilled.

“The final battle damage will take some time, but the assessments of the initial battle damage indicate that all three sites have been severely damaged and severely destroyed,” Kane said.

Vans said in a television interview that although he would not discuss “sensitive intelligence about what we saw on the ground,” he felt “very confident that we delayed their development of a nuclear weapon.”

He reduced it, he told NBC “Meet The Press” that “I think we really paid their program again for a very long time. I think it would be many years before the Iranians could develop a nuclear weapon.”

The vice president said that the United States “negotiated” strongly “with Iran to try to find a peaceful settlement and that Trump made his decision after the Iranian evaluation did not act” in good faith. ”

“I actually think it provides an opportunity to reset this relationship, reset these negotiations and make us in a place where Iran can decide not to pose a threat to its neighbors, not to be a threat to the United States, and if they are ready to do so, the United States is all the ears,” Vans said.

“There are no planned military operations at the present time against Iran, unless they spoil and attack” American interests.

Trump had threatened by other countries, but he often retracted or failed to follow up, given his promises to his voter alliance not to form the United States in an extended war. It was not immediately clear whether Iran had seen avoiding a wider conflict as in its best interest.

How Iran and others interact with American strikes

Most of the world absorbs the consequences of strikes and risks that can lead to more fighting in the Middle East yet We have introduced himself In the war between Israel and Iran. The Israeli air strikes, which started on June 13, targeted the Iranian local companion and general, which prompted revenge against Iran and created a series of events that contributed to the American attack.

While American officials urged caution and confirmed that only nuclear sites were targeting Washington, Iran criticized the measures as a violation of its sovereignty and international law.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi said that Washington is “completely responsible” for any measures that Tehran might take in response.

“They crossed a very large red line by attacking nuclear facilities,” he said at a press conference in Türkiye. “I don’t know how much the room for diplomacy remains.”

China and Russia, where Aragcha was heading to talks with President Vladimir Putin, condemned the American military action. The Russian Foreign Ministry, which also called for “restoring the situation to a political and diplomatic path, said,” The Turkish Foreign Ministry statement warned of the risk of conflict to the “global level”.

British Prime Minister Kiir Starmer said that the United Kingdom was transporting military equipment to the region to protect its interests, people and allies. His office said that he spoke on Sunday with Trump about the need for Tehran to resume negotiations, but Trump would have made his statements about changing the regime after their talk.

The leaders of Italy, Canada, Germany and France have agreed to the need for “a quick resumption of negotiations.” Emmanuel Macron France held talks with the Saudi Crown Prince and the Sultan of Oman.

Iran can try to stop oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz, which can create the same type of inflationary trauma that the world felt after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Oil prices in financial markets increased with the increase in the war between the state of Israel and Iran, and climbed by 21 % during the past month.

HegSeth provides an explanation of the schedule

The Pentagon broke out any new details about the Iranian nuclear capabilities. Higseth said that the timeline of the strikes was the result of a timetable set by Trump to talk with Iran on its nuclear ambitions.

“Iran discovered,” when Trump says 60 days he is looking for peace and negotiation, it means 60 days of peace and negotiation. “Otherwise, this nuclear program, that the new nuclear ability will not be present. It meant that. ”

This statement was complicated, as the White House suggested last Thursday that Trump could take up to two weeks to determine whether it would strike Iran or continue to follow the negotiations. However, the United States benefited from the weak Iranian air defenses and managed to carry out attacks without resistance from Iran.

Kane said: “Iran’s fighters did not fly, and it seems that the missile systems in Iran have not seen us throughout the mission,” Kane said.

Higseth said that the option to transfer a number of bombers from their base in Missouri early on Saturday was supposed to be a trap to cancel the Iranians. Kane added that the United States also used other methods of deception, as it deployed fighters to protect the B-2 launchers that dropped a total of 14 bombs on Iran’s positions in Fordo and Natanz.

The strikes occurred on Saturday between 6:40 pm and 7:05 pm in Washington, or around 2:10 am on Sunday in Iran.



https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/AP25173083175850.jpg?resize=1200,600

Source link

Leave a Comment